From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: fdmanana@kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Btrfs: fix fsync xattr loss in the fast fsync path
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 15:55:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160301235505.GC27735@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434757491-28325-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@kernel.org>
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:44:51AM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
>
> After commit 4f764e515361 ("Btrfs: remove deleted xattrs on fsync log
> replay"), we can end up in a situation where during log replay we end up
> deleting xattrs that were never deleted when their file was last fsynced.
>
> This happens in the fast fsync path (flag BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC is
> not set in the inode) if the inode has the flag BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING
> set, the xattr was added in a past transaction and the leaf where the
> xattr is located was not updated (COWed or created) in the current
> transaction. In this scenario the xattr item never ends up in the log
> tree and therefore at log replay time, which makes the replay code delete
> the xattr from the fs/subvol tree as it thinks that xattr was deleted
> prior to the last fsync.
>
> Fix this by always logging all xattrs, which is the simplest and most
> reliable way to detect deleted xattrs and replay the deletes at log replay
> time.
>
> This issue is reproducible with the following test case for fstests:
[...]
This is a good candidate for stable, isn't it?
Thanks,
-liubo
>
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> ---
>
> V2: Updated reproducer test, no code changes.
> The first version of the test actually only failed if my other
> unrelated patch titled "Btrfs: fix fsync data loss after append write"
> was applied. That's because it forced logging the inode item which
> is necessary to trigger the xattr deletion replay code. So updated
> the test such that it fails without that patch applied too.
>
> V3: Changed to a simpler approach which doesn't require a new key type,
> as the previous solution would make an older kernel not do the
> xattr deletion replay for log trees created by a more recent kernel
> with this patch.
>
> fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
> index 4920fce..7ac45cf 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
> @@ -4123,6 +4123,86 @@ static int logged_inode_size(struct btrfs_root *log, struct inode *inode,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * At the moment we always log all xattrs. This is to figure out at log replay
> + * time which xattrs must have their deletion replayed. If a xattr is missing
> + * in the log tree and exists in the fs/subvol tree, we delete it. This is
> + * because if a xattr is deleted, the inode is fsynced and a power failure
> + * happens, causing the log to be replayed the next time the fs is mounted,
> + * we want the xattr to not exist anymore (same behaviour as other filesystems
> + * with a journal, ext3/4, xfs, f2fs, etc).
> + */
> +static int btrfs_log_all_xattrs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> + struct btrfs_root *root,
> + struct inode *inode,
> + struct btrfs_path *path,
> + struct btrfs_path *dst_path)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct btrfs_key key;
> + const u64 ino = btrfs_ino(inode);
> + int ins_nr = 0;
> + int start_slot = 0;
> +
> + key.objectid = ino;
> + key.type = BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY;
> + key.offset = 0;
> +
> + ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + while (true) {
> + int slot = path->slots[0];
> + struct extent_buffer *leaf = path->nodes[0];
> + int nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(leaf);
> +
> + if (slot >= nritems) {
> + if (ins_nr > 0) {
> + u64 last_extent = 0;
> +
> + ret = copy_items(trans, inode, dst_path, path,
> + &last_extent, start_slot,
> + ins_nr, 1, 0);
> + /* can't be 1, extent items aren't processed */
> + ASSERT(ret <= 0);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + ins_nr = 0;
> + }
> + ret = btrfs_next_leaf(root, path);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + else if (ret > 0)
> + break;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, slot);
> + if (key.objectid != ino || key.type != BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY)
> + break;
> +
> + if (ins_nr == 0)
> + start_slot = slot;
> + ins_nr++;
> + path->slots[0]++;
> + cond_resched();
> + }
> + if (ins_nr > 0) {
> + u64 last_extent = 0;
> +
> + ret = copy_items(trans, inode, dst_path, path,
> + &last_extent, start_slot,
> + ins_nr, 1, 0);
> + /* can't be 1, extent items aren't processed */
> + ASSERT(ret <= 0);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /* log a single inode in the tree log.
> * At least one parent directory for this inode must exist in the tree
> * or be logged already.
> @@ -4295,6 +4375,25 @@ again:
> if (min_key.type == BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY)
> need_log_inode_item = false;
>
> + /* Skip xattrs, we log them later with btrfs_log_all_xattrs() */
> + if (min_key.type == BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY) {
> + if (ins_nr == 0)
> + goto next_slot;
> + ret = copy_items(trans, inode, dst_path, path,
> + &last_extent, ins_start_slot,
> + ins_nr, inode_only, logged_isize);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + err = ret;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> + ins_nr = 0;
> + if (ret) {
> + btrfs_release_path(path);
> + continue;
> + }
> + goto next_slot;
> + }
> +
> src = path->nodes[0];
> if (ins_nr && ins_start_slot + ins_nr == path->slots[0]) {
> ins_nr++;
> @@ -4362,6 +4461,11 @@ next_slot:
> ins_nr = 0;
> }
>
> + btrfs_release_path(path);
> + btrfs_release_path(dst_path);
> + err = btrfs_log_all_xattrs(trans, root, inode, path, dst_path);
> + if (err)
> + goto out_unlock;
> log_extents:
> btrfs_release_path(path);
> btrfs_release_path(dst_path);
> --
> 2.1.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-01 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-17 11:49 [PATCH] Btrfs: fix fsync xattr loss in the fast fsync path fdmanana
2015-06-18 2:16 ` [PATCH v2] " fdmanana
2015-06-19 23:44 ` [PATCH v3] " fdmanana
2016-03-01 23:55 ` Liu Bo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160301235505.GC27735@localhost.localdomain \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).