linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>,
	sri <toyours_sridhar@yahoo.co.in>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: how many chunk trees and extent trees present
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:02:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160303100244.GE29310@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CFAA79.9020706@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:29:29AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> David Sterba wrote on 2015/04/17 19:29 +0200:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:19:11AM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote:
> >>> In, some article i read that future there will be more chunk tree/ extent
> >>> tree for single btrfs. Is this true.
> >>
> >>     I recall, many moons ago, Chris saying that there probably wouldn't
> >> be.
> >
> > More extent trees tied to a set of fs trees/subvolumes would be very
> > useful for certain usecases *cough*encryption*cough*.
> 
> BTW, will such design makes reflink between different set of extents 
> fallback to normal copy?

Yes, the actual reflink will not be possible.

> And I'm pretty sure that inband dedup will be affected too...

Yes.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-03 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-17  6:24 how many chunk trees and extent trees present sri
2015-04-17  9:19 ` Hugo Mills
2015-04-17  9:56   ` sri
2016-02-25 12:16     ` sri
2016-02-26  1:21       ` Qu Wenruo
2015-04-17 17:29   ` David Sterba
2016-02-26  1:29     ` Qu Wenruo
2016-03-03 10:02       ` David Sterba [this message]
2016-03-04  2:58     ` Anand Jain
2016-03-04  9:26       ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160303100244.GE29310@suse.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=toyours_sridhar@yahoo.co.in \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).