Re: recovery problem raid5

[Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1071 bytes --]

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 05:31:51PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> wrote:
> >    The main thing you haven't tried here is mount -o degraded, which
> > is the thing to do if you have a missing device in your array.
> >
> >    Also, that kernel's not really all that good for a parity RAID
> > array -- it's the very first one that had the scrub and replace
> > implementation, so it's rather less stable with parity RAID than the
> > later 4.x kernels. That's probably not the issue here, though.
> 
> 
> It's a 4.5.0 kernel with 3.19 progs. I'd update the progs even though
> that's unlikely the problem.

   Oh, my mistake. I misread the 3.19 as the kernel version.

   Marcin: Stick with the 4.5 kernel.

   Hugo.

-- 
Hugo Mills             | Yes, this is an example of something that becomes
hugo@... carfax.org.uk | less explosive as a one-to-one cocrystal with TNT.
http://carfax.org.uk/  | (Hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane)
PGP: E2AB1DE4          |                                            Derek Lowe

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]