linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, logfs@logfs.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, debug: report when GFP_NO{FS,IO} is used explicitly from memalloc_no{fs,io}_{save,restore} context
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:03:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160427080311.GC2179@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160426225845.GF26977@dastard>

On Wed 27-04-16 08:58:45, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:56:12PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > 
> > THIS PATCH IS FOR TESTING ONLY AND NOT MEANT TO HIT LINUS TREE
> > 
> > It is desirable to reduce the direct GFP_NO{FS,IO} usage at minimum and
> > prefer scope usage defined by memalloc_no{fs,io}_{save,restore} API.
> > 
> > Let's help this process and add a debugging tool to catch when an
> > explicit allocation request for GFP_NO{FS,IO} is done from the scope
> > context. The printed stacktrace should help to identify the caller
> > and evaluate whether it can be changed to use a wider context or whether
> > it is called from another potentially dangerous context which needs
> > a scope protection as well.
> 
> You're going to get a large number of these from XFS. There are call
> paths in XFs that get called both inside and outside transaction
> context, and many of them are marked with GFP_NOFS to prevent issues
> that have cropped up in the past.
> 
> Often these are to silence lockdep warnings (e.g. commit b17cb36
> ("xfs: fix missing KM_NOFS tags to keep lockdep happy")) because
> lockdep gets very unhappy about the same functions being called with
> different reclaim contexts. e.g.  directory block mapping might
> occur from readdir (no transaction context) or within transactions
> (create/unlink). hence paths like this are tagged with GFP_NOFS to
> stop lockdep emitting false positive warnings....

I would much rather see lockdep being fixed than abusing GFP_NOFS to
workaround its limitations. GFP_NOFS has a real consequences to the
memory reclaim. I will go and check the commit you mentioned and try
to understand why that is a problem. From what you described above
I would like to get rid of exactly this kind of usage which is not
really needed for the recursion protection.

Thanks!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-27  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-26 11:56 [PATCH 0/2] scop GFP_NOFS api Michal Hocko
2016-04-26 11:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: add PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS Michal Hocko
2016-04-26 23:07   ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-27  7:51     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-27 11:54   ` [PATCH 1.1/2] xfs: abstract PF_FSTRANS to PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS Michal Hocko
2016-04-27 11:54     ` [PATCH 1.2/2] mm: introduce memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} API Michal Hocko
2016-04-27 13:07       ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-27 20:09       ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-27 20:30         ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-27 21:14       ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-27 17:41     ` [PATCH 1.1/2] xfs: abstract PF_FSTRANS to PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS Andreas Dilger
2016-04-27 19:43       ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-26 11:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm, debug: report when GFP_NO{FS,IO} is used explicitly from memalloc_no{fs,io}_{save,restore} context Michal Hocko
2016-04-26 22:58   ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-27  8:03     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-04-27 22:55       ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-29  5:35 ` [PATCH 0/2] scop GFP_NOFS api NeilBrown
2016-04-29 10:20   ` [Cluster-devel] " Steven Whitehouse
2016-04-30 21:17     ` NeilBrown
2016-04-29 12:04   ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-30  0:24     ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-30 21:55     ` NeilBrown
2016-05-03 15:13       ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-03 23:26         ` NeilBrown
2016-04-30  0:11   ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-30 22:19     ` NeilBrown
2016-05-04  1:00       ` Dave Chinner
2016-05-06  3:20         ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160427080311.GC2179@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=logfs@logfs.org \
    --cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).