linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
	btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: About in-band dedupe for v4.7
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 18:39:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160511163915.GG29353@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aae84f04-cb64-46f3-79ea-f2d84d79a3ba@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:19:52PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> As merge window for v4.7 is coming, it would be good to hear your ideas 
> about the inband dedupe.

For me it's still in the process of review.

> We are addressing the ENOSPC problem which Josef pointed out, and we 
> believe the final fix patch would come out at the beginning of the merge 
> window.(Next week)
> 
> If it's fine, would you please consider to merge the in-memory backend 
> patchset for v4.7 as an experimental feature?
>
> Most of the patch won't be changed from v10 patchset, only ENOSPC fix 
> will be updated, and ioctl patchset will introduce a new Kconfig option 
> of "btrfs experimental features" for inband dedupe.
> (With explain about unstable ioctl/on-disk format for experimental features)
>
> If you are all OK to merge inband dedupe in-memory backend, I'll prepare 
> the new v11 patchset for this merge.

Given the unfixed bug(s) and lack of review/ack from others, 4.7 cannot
be considered as merging target.  I had promised to put the patchset
branch to my for-next (regarding v10) but forgot to do it, too many
patches to juggle sorry.  Ideally, a feature like this should spend a
full development cycle in next so it gets enough exposure and testing.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-11 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-10  7:19 About in-band dedupe for v4.7 Qu Wenruo
2016-05-10 22:11 ` Mark Fasheh
2016-05-11  1:03   ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-11  2:52     ` Mark Fasheh
2016-05-11  9:14       ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-11 17:36       ` David Sterba
2016-05-12 20:54         ` Mark Fasheh
2016-05-13  7:14           ` Duncan
2016-05-13 12:14           ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-05-13 14:25             ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-13 16:37             ` Zygo Blaxell
2016-05-16 15:26           ` David Sterba
2016-05-13  6:01         ` Zygo Blaxell
2016-05-11 16:56   ` David Sterba
2016-05-13  3:13   ` Wang Shilong
2016-05-13  3:44     ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-13  6:21       ` Zygo Blaxell
2016-05-16 16:40     ` David Sterba
2016-05-11  0:37 ` Chris Mason
2016-05-11  1:40   ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-11  2:26     ` Satoru Takeuchi
2016-05-11  4:22     ` Mark Fasheh
2016-05-11 16:39 ` David Sterba [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160511163915.GG29353@suse.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).