From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: About in-band dedupe for v4.7
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 18:39:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160511163915.GG29353@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aae84f04-cb64-46f3-79ea-f2d84d79a3ba@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:19:52PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> As merge window for v4.7 is coming, it would be good to hear your ideas
> about the inband dedupe.
For me it's still in the process of review.
> We are addressing the ENOSPC problem which Josef pointed out, and we
> believe the final fix patch would come out at the beginning of the merge
> window.(Next week)
>
> If it's fine, would you please consider to merge the in-memory backend
> patchset for v4.7 as an experimental feature?
>
> Most of the patch won't be changed from v10 patchset, only ENOSPC fix
> will be updated, and ioctl patchset will introduce a new Kconfig option
> of "btrfs experimental features" for inband dedupe.
> (With explain about unstable ioctl/on-disk format for experimental features)
>
> If you are all OK to merge inband dedupe in-memory backend, I'll prepare
> the new v11 patchset for this merge.
Given the unfixed bug(s) and lack of review/ack from others, 4.7 cannot
be considered as merging target. I had promised to put the patchset
branch to my for-next (regarding v10) but forgot to do it, too many
patches to juggle sorry. Ideally, a feature like this should spend a
full development cycle in next so it gets enough exposure and testing.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-11 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-10 7:19 About in-band dedupe for v4.7 Qu Wenruo
2016-05-10 22:11 ` Mark Fasheh
2016-05-11 1:03 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-11 2:52 ` Mark Fasheh
2016-05-11 9:14 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-11 17:36 ` David Sterba
2016-05-12 20:54 ` Mark Fasheh
2016-05-13 7:14 ` Duncan
2016-05-13 12:14 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-05-13 14:25 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-13 16:37 ` Zygo Blaxell
2016-05-16 15:26 ` David Sterba
2016-05-13 6:01 ` Zygo Blaxell
2016-05-11 16:56 ` David Sterba
2016-05-13 3:13 ` Wang Shilong
2016-05-13 3:44 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-13 6:21 ` Zygo Blaxell
2016-05-16 16:40 ` David Sterba
2016-05-11 0:37 ` Chris Mason
2016-05-11 1:40 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-11 2:26 ` Satoru Takeuchi
2016-05-11 4:22 ` Mark Fasheh
2016-05-11 16:39 ` David Sterba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160511163915.GG29353@suse.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).