linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fstests: btrfs: fix 006 adds _runnt_btrfs_util_prog()
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:18:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160623111843.GL3226@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24a2491d-91d7-0e45-5008-e784b7a699fd@oracle.com>

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:03:59PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06/23/2016 06:53 PM, Eryu Guan wrote:
[snip]
> > > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > > index a44fb8750220..2a10fbb2d341 100644
> > > --- a/common/rc
> > > +++ b/common/rc
> > > @@ -3114,6 +3114,17 @@ _min_dio_alignment()
> > >      fi
> > >  }
> > > 
> > > +run_check_dontfail()
> > > +{
> > > +	echo "# $@" >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > +	"$@" >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || echo "failed: '$@'"
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +_runnt_btrfs_util_prog()
> > > +{
> > > +	run_check_dontfail $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG $*
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  run_check()
> > >  {
> > >  	echo "# $@" >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/006 b/tests/btrfs/006
> > > index 715fd80fb6fc..9d1fe09e07de 100755
> > > --- a/tests/btrfs/006
> > > +++ b/tests/btrfs/006
> > > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ echo "== Show filesystem by UUID"
> > >  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem show $UUID | _filter_btrfs_filesystem_show $TOTAL_DEVS $UUID
> > > 
> > >  echo "== Sync filesystem"
> > > -$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch
> > > +_runnt_btrfs_util_prog filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT
> > 
> > Still, I don't think this helper is necessary.
> > 
> > $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT >/dev/null
> > 
> > doesn't _fail on failure, output error messages breaks golden image, and
> > is much simpler. Do I miss anything?
> 
>  runnt_btrfs_util_prog() checks the return status of the command,
>  if failed (!0) it will echo so to break the golden image.

So it fails silently now? (return non-zero value and print no error
message) That seems a btrfs-progs bug to me.. It should print error
messages to stderr on failure, so we don't have to check the return
value explicitly.

Thanks,
Eryu

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-23 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-23 10:37 [PATCH v2] fstests: btrfs: fix 006 adds _runnt_btrfs_util_prog() Anand Jain
2016-06-23 10:53 ` Eryu Guan
2016-06-23 11:03   ` Anand Jain
2016-06-23 11:18     ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2016-06-23 11:34       ` Anand Jain
2016-06-23 11:54         ` Filipe Manana
2016-06-23 11:59           ` Anand Jain
2016-06-23 12:11         ` Eryu Guan
2016-06-23 12:24           ` Anand Jain
2016-06-23 13:17 ` [PATCH v3] fstests: btrfs: fix 006 Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160623111843.GL3226@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).