From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:37252 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934856AbcHBMdD (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:33:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 05:32:45 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Shaun Tancheff , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , Mike Christie Subject: Re: Fixup direct bi_rw modifiers Message-ID: <20160802123245.GA18679@infradead.org> References: <1469915148-20452-1-git-send-email-shaun@tancheff.com> <20160801114713.GA16806@infradead.org> <36734f69-33f5-c2fd-67da-d2d867741403@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 01:55:36PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Set of three patches, where the target one is an actual bug fix... > Temporary branch, I'll rebase it once -rc1 is out, if more > changes/fixups need to be made in the next week until that happens. > > http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=for-4.8/bi_rwf Thanks. Any chance to have a slightly better name for the field? E.g. bi_opf or bi_op_flags if we want to be a bit more verbose.