From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] generic: check whether we can truncate heavily reflinked file
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 23:18:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160922061806.GC3059@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160922021308.4594-1-wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:13:08AM +0800, Wang Xiaoguang wrote:
> In btrfs, there is a bug about btrfs' truncate codes, it'll leak
> some fs space as the truncate operation proceeds. If this truncate
> operation is very large, later metadata request in this truncate
> operation may fail for enospc error. I also have sent a kernel
> patch fot btrfs to fix this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> tests/generic/379 | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/generic/379.out | 2 ++
> tests/generic/group | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/generic/379
> create mode 100644 tests/generic/379.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/379 b/tests/generic/379
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..3d2918a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/379
> @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# FS QA Test 379
> +#
> +# Create a heavily reflinked file, then check whether we can truncate
> +# it correctly.
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (c) 2016 Fujitsu. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
> +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1 # failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + cd /
> + rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +. ./common/reflink
> +
> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# Modify as appropriate.
> +_supported_fs generic
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_scratch_reflink
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs_sized $((32 * 1024 * 1024)) >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +testfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile
> +dummyfile1=$SCRATCH_MNT/dummyfile1
> +dummyfile2=$SCRATCH_MNT/dummyfile2
> +blocksize=$((128 * 1024))
> +
> +# create two dummy files, which is used to occupy some fs space first.
> +_pwrite_byte 0xcdcdcdcd 0 $((8 * 1024 * 1024)) $dummyfile1 > /dev/null
> +_pwrite_byte 0xcdcdcdcd 0 $((1 * 1024 * 1024)) $dummyfile2 > /dev/null
> +_pwrite_byte 0xcdcdcdcd 0 $blocksize $testfile > /dev/null
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +# try to do reflink unless we get enospc error.
> +i=1
> +while true; do
> + _reflink_range $testfile 0 $testfile $(($i * $blocksize)) $blocksize \
> + 2>&1 | grep -q "No space left on device"
> + if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
> + break
> + fi
> + i=$((i + 1))
> +done
So, uh... I ran this test on XFS, during which I observed that this loop
was only eating space at a rate of about 3KB/s. The created FS is 18MB and
12 of that is used by the dummy files, so that means it'll take about an
hour to run?
(I guess you didn't put it in the 'quick' group, good.)
The file got to be about 16GB in length before I got impatient and killed it.
Is this expected for this test?
--D
> +# fs is almost full now and fs internal operations may need some free space,
> +# for example, in btrfs, transaction will need to reserve space first, so here
> +# free 1MB space.
> +rm -rf $dummyfile2
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 0" $testfile
> +
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/generic/379.out b/tests/generic/379.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ec12148
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/379.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 379
> +Silence is golden
> diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group
> index a602b01..73fce91 100644
> --- a/tests/generic/group
> +++ b/tests/generic/group
> @@ -381,3 +381,4 @@
> 376 auto quick metadata
> 377 attr auto quick metadata
> 378 auto quick metadata
> +379 auto clone
> --
> 2.9.0
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-22 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-22 2:13 [PATCH v2] generic: check whether we can truncate heavily reflinked file Wang Xiaoguang
2016-09-22 6:18 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2016-09-22 7:49 ` Wang Xiaoguang
2016-09-22 7:14 ` Eryu Guan
2016-09-22 7:51 ` Wang Xiaoguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160922061806.GC3059@birch.djwong.org \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).