linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] btrfs: fix a possible umount deadlock
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 18:20:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161003162037.GB6576@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b16b4d32-9990-25d3-2973-f2bae1e6fba5@suse.com>

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:24:07PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> This isn't necessarily a comment on this code in particular, but what's
> the reason for using call_rcu to defer the freeing instead of
> synchronize_rcu and freeing the device directly via __free_device (if it
> accepted a btrfs_device)?  It's a pattern that's used throughout
> volumes.c and it's old[1].  I'm not sure if it was intentional to defer
> freeing since that was actually a functional change from the code it
> replaced.

It could be unintentional, the patch was supposed to relax the read-only
side, ie. use RCU instead of mutex. Deferred freeing does not seem to be
necessary. The device locking code needs cleanup/refactoring.

      reply	other threads:[~2016-10-03 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-09  8:31 [PATCH] btrfs: fix a possible umount deadlock Anand Jain
2016-09-09 12:53 ` David Sterba
2016-09-09 23:08   ` Anand Jain
2016-09-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Anand Jain
2016-09-21 14:26   ` David Sterba
2016-09-22  4:59     ` Anand Jain
2016-09-22  4:56 ` [PATCH v3] " Anand Jain
2016-09-22 15:35   ` David Sterba
2016-09-22 16:24   ` Jeff Mahoney
2016-10-03 16:20     ` David Sterba [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161003162037.GB6576@suse.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=jeffm@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).