From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52964 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751743AbcJFHlz (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2016 03:41:55 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FA9AAD1 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 07:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 09:41:35 +0200 From: David Sterba To: Jeff Mahoney Cc: David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: opencode chunk locking, remove helpers Message-ID: <20161006074134.GG6576@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz References: <20161005122306.3530-1-dsterba@suse.com> <50a2d25f-844b-651c-4d55-2a5ea66d178e@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <50a2d25f-844b-651c-4d55-2a5ea66d178e@suse.com> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 02:41:24PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote: > On 10/5/16 8:23 AM, David Sterba wrote: > > The helpers are trivial and we don't use them consistently. > > This one is going to conflict with the root->fs_info removal patchset in > every chunk since the helper does nothing with the root. Otherwise, the > idea is sound. No problem, I'll refresh and resend after the fsinfo/root series.