From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:44:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161017154443.GA13942@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161017130025.GI11398@twin.jikos.cz>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:00:25PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 09:47:11AM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > > Since the crash is similar to the call chains from Jeff's report,
> > > ie.
> > > btrfs_del_csums
> > > -> btrfs_search_slot
> > > -> btrfs_cow_block
> > > -> btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty
> > >
> > > I just wonder that whether 4.8.0-rc8-btrfs-next-35+ has
> > >
> > > "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty" ?
> >
> > It isn't there, this 4.8.0-rc8-btrfs-next-35+ is a checkout of Chris'
> > for-linus-4.9 branch.
> > That patch should have been there, I was convinced that all these
> > related patches were already there, as it's impossible to run xfstests
> > with the integrity checker enabled.
>
> The referenced patch is the one in this thread, no? You've reported that
> even with that applied you can still reproduce a crash with integrity
> checker enabled. I haven't queued it as it seems it's an incomplete fix,
> thus waiting for another version.
Yes, it's one of three patches in this thread, and they fixed different
problems,
- the original patch and its v2 are to make check_leaf check non-root
leaf with zero-item,
- "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty" is to fix
check_leaf, which fixes the crash from Jeff's.
- "[PATCH] Btrfs: remove unnecessary btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty in split_leaf"
is targeting a different crash with check integrity enabled, which
comes from Filipe's report.
So to make sure I understand the whole thing, Filipe, can you reproduce the
crash around btrfs_del_csums() after applying this patch
"[PATCH] Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty"?
Thanks,
-liubo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-17 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 4:57 [PATCH] Btrfs: detect corruption when non-root leaf has zero item Liu Bo
2016-08-16 17:07 ` David Sterba
2016-08-22 0:04 ` Liu Bo
2016-08-23 22:22 ` [PATCH v2] " Liu Bo
2016-08-24 11:51 ` David Sterba
2016-09-02 5:26 ` Jeff Mahoney
2016-09-02 19:33 ` Liu Bo
2016-09-02 19:35 ` [PATCH] Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty Liu Bo
2016-09-05 15:28 ` Filipe Manana
2016-09-06 21:51 ` Liu Bo
2016-09-07 14:25 ` Jeff Mahoney
2016-09-07 21:36 ` Liu Bo
2016-10-12 21:23 ` Filipe Manana
2016-10-13 0:37 ` Liu Bo
2016-10-13 8:47 ` Filipe Manana
2016-10-17 13:00 ` David Sterba
2016-10-17 15:44 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2016-11-23 13:15 ` Filipe Manana
2016-11-23 17:48 ` Filipe Manana
2016-11-23 21:39 ` Liu Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161017154443.GA13942@localhost.localdomain \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).