linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: Martin Steigerwald <martin.steigerwald@teamix.de>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, Martin <martin@lichtvoll.de>
Subject: Re: degraded BTRFS RAID 1 not mountable: open_ctree failed, unable to find block group for 0
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:00:31 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161116160031.59041b46@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3374757.aMVjisyVFB@merkaba>

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:55:32 +0100
Martin Steigerwald <martin.steigerwald@teamix.de> wrote:

> I do think that above kernel messages invite such a kind of interpretation
> tough. I took the "BTRFS: open_ctree failed" message as indicative to some
> structural issue with the filesystem.

For the reason as to why the writable mount didn't work, check "btrfs fi df"
for the filesystem to see if you have any "single" profile chunks on it: quite
likely you did already mount it "degraded,rw" in the past *once*, after which
those "single" chunks get created, and consequently it won't mount r/w anymore
(without lifting the restriction on the number of missing devices as proposed).

-- 
With respect,
Roman

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-16 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-16 10:25 degraded BTRFS RAID 1 not mountable: open_ctree failed, unable to find block group for 0 Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 10:43 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-16 10:55   ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 11:00     ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2016-11-16 11:04       ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 12:57         ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-11-16 17:06           ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-17 20:05             ` Chris Murphy
2016-11-17 20:20               ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-11-19 20:27                 ` Chris Murphy
2016-11-20 11:58                 ` Niccolò Belli
2016-11-17 20:46               ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 11:18     ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 12:48     ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-22  9:31 g6094199
2017-08-22 10:28 ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov
2017-08-23 13:12 g6094199

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161116160031.59041b46@natsu \
    --to=rm@romanrm.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.steigerwald@teamix.de \
    --cc=martin@lichtvoll.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).