From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: fdmanana@kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: bulk delete checksum items in the same leaf
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:02:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170131010245.GA2552@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485583592-25555-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@kernel.org>
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 06:06:32AM +0000, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
>
> Very often we have the checksums for an extent spread in multiple items
> in the checksums tree, and currently the algorithm to delete them starts
> by looking for them one by one and then deleting them one by one, which
> is not optimal since each deletion involves shifting all the other items
> in the leaf and when the leaf reaches some low threshold, to move items
> off the leaf into its left and right neighbor leafs. Also, after each
> item deletion we release our search path and start a new search for other
> checksums items.
>
> So optimize this by deleting in bulk all the items in the same leaf that
> contain checksums for the extent being freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> index e97e322..d7d6d4a 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> @@ -643,7 +643,33 @@ int btrfs_del_csums(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>
> /* delete the entire item, it is inside our range */
> if (key.offset >= bytenr && csum_end <= end_byte) {
> - ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, root, path);
> + int del_nr = 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * Check how many csum items preceding this one in this
> + * leaf correspond to our range and then delete them all
> + * at once.
> + */
> + if (key.offset > bytenr && path->slots[0] > 0) {
> + int slot = path->slots[0] - 1;
> +
> + while (slot >= 0) {
> + struct btrfs_key pk;
> +
> + btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &pk, slot);
> + if (pk.offset < bytenr ||
> + pk.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_KEY ||
> + pk.objectid !=
> + BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_OBJECTID)
> + break;
> + path->slots[0] = slot;
> + del_nr++;
> + key.offset = pk.offset;
> + slot--;
> + }
> + }
> + ret = btrfs_del_items(trans, root, path,
> + path->slots[0], del_nr);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> if (key.offset == bytenr)
Hmm, this seems like the kind of operation that could use a helper.
btrfs_del_item_range() or something like that, which takes the maximum
key to delete. What do you think?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-31 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-28 6:06 [PATCH] Btrfs: bulk delete checksum items in the same leaf fdmanana
2017-01-31 1:02 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2017-01-31 1:04 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-01-31 9:54 ` Filipe Manana
2017-01-31 15:38 ` Liu Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170131010245.GA2552@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).