linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Btrfs: create a helper for getting chunk map
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:19:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170301021955.GC9546@lim.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb4ca745-c23a-aa12-0446-dde110f4e9c9@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:20:33AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> At 02/18/2017 09:28 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
> > We have similar code here and there, this merges them into a helper.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
> 
> Looks good overall.
> 
> Although small nitpick inlined below.

Thank you for going through this.

> > ---
> >  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |   3 +-
> >  fs/btrfs/volumes.c   | 163 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> >  fs/btrfs/volumes.h   |   2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> > index 4ac383a..609ece1 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> > @@ -2007,14 +2007,13 @@ int repair_io_failure(struct inode *inode, u64 start, u64 length, u64 logical,
> >  	u64 map_length = 0;
> >  	u64 sector;
> >  	struct btrfs_bio *bbio = NULL;
> > -	struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
> >  	int ret;
> > 
> >  	ASSERT(!(fs_info->sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY));
> >  	BUG_ON(!mirror_num);
> > 
> >  	/* we can't repair anything in raid56 yet */
> > -	if (btrfs_is_parity_mirror(map_tree, logical, length, mirror_num))
> > +	if (btrfs_is_parity_mirror(fs_info, logical, length, mirror_num))
> 
> Not sure if such small parameter cleanup can be split into a separate patch.
> At least it's less related to the get_chunk_map() helper.
>

But it's not a cleanup, it is get_chunk_map() that needs @fs_info.

> >  		return 0;
> > 
> >  	bio = btrfs_io_bio_alloc(GFP_NOFS, 1);
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > index 3c3c69c..c52b0fe 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > @@ -2794,10 +2794,38 @@ static int btrfs_del_sys_chunk(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > 
> > +static struct extent_map *get_chunk_map(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> > +					u64 logical, u64 length)
> > +{
> > +	struct extent_map_tree *em_tree;
> > +	struct extent_map *em;
> > +
> > +	em_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree.map_tree;
> > +	read_lock(&em_tree->lock);
> > +	em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, logical, length);
> > +	read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
> > +
> > +	if (!em) {
> > +		btrfs_crit(fs_info, "unable to find logical %llu len %llu",
> > +			logical, length);
> 
> Nice error message, would be quite helpful when we hit some bug later.
> 
> > +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> 
> Normally I'd return -ENOENT, not sure what's the correct return here though.
>

So I tried to be consistent with the error handling of other places of searching
chunk mapping tree.

I think EINVAL makes sense here, either @logical or @length is not valid.

> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (em->start > logical || em->start + em->len < logical) {
> > +		btrfs_crit(fs_info,
> > +			   "found a bad mapping, wanted %llu, found %llu-%llu",
> > +			   logical, em->start, em->start + em->len);
> 
> Better outputting @length also.
>

OK, I'll update it with @length.

Thanks,

-liubo

> Thanks,
> Qu
> 
> > +		free_extent_map(em);
> > +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* callers are responsible for dropping em's ref. */
> > +	return em;
> > +}
> > +
> >  int btrfs_remove_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> >  		       struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 chunk_offset)
> >  {
> > -	struct extent_map_tree *em_tree;
> >  	struct extent_map *em;
> >  	struct map_lookup *map;
> >  	u64 dev_extent_len = 0;
> > @@ -2805,23 +2833,15 @@ int btrfs_remove_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> >  	int i, ret = 0;
> >  	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = fs_info->fs_devices;
> > 
> > -	em_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree.map_tree;
> > -
> > -	read_lock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -	em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, chunk_offset, 1);
> > -	read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -
> > -	if (!em || em->start > chunk_offset ||
> > -	    em->start + em->len < chunk_offset) {
> > +	em = get_chunk_map(fs_info, chunk_offset, 1);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(em)) {
> >  		/*
> >  		 * This is a logic error, but we don't want to just rely on the
> >  		 * user having built with ASSERT enabled, so if ASSERT doesn't
> >  		 * do anything we still error out.
> >  		 */
> >  		ASSERT(0);
> > -		if (em)
> > -			free_extent_map(em);
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > +		return PTR_ERR(em);
> >  	}
> >  	map = em->map_lookup;
> >  	mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
> > @@ -4888,7 +4908,6 @@ int btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> >  	struct btrfs_device *device;
> >  	struct btrfs_chunk *chunk;
> >  	struct btrfs_stripe *stripe;
> > -	struct extent_map_tree *em_tree;
> >  	struct extent_map *em;
> >  	struct map_lookup *map;
> >  	size_t item_size;
> > @@ -4897,24 +4916,9 @@ int btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> >  	int i = 0;
> >  	int ret = 0;
> > 
> > -	em_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree.map_tree;
> > -	read_lock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -	em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, chunk_offset, chunk_size);
> > -	read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -
> > -	if (!em) {
> > -		btrfs_crit(fs_info, "unable to find logical %Lu len %Lu",
> > -			   chunk_offset, chunk_size);
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	if (em->start != chunk_offset || em->len != chunk_size) {
> > -		btrfs_crit(fs_info,
> > -			   "found a bad mapping, wanted %Lu-%Lu, found %Lu-%Lu",
> > -			    chunk_offset, chunk_size, em->start, em->len);
> > -		free_extent_map(em);
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -	}
> > +	em = get_chunk_map(fs_info, chunk_offset, chunk_size);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(em))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(em);
> > 
> >  	map = em->map_lookup;
> >  	item_size = btrfs_chunk_item_size(map->num_stripes);
> > @@ -5057,15 +5061,12 @@ int btrfs_chunk_readonly(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 chunk_offset)
> >  {
> >  	struct extent_map *em;
> >  	struct map_lookup *map;
> > -	struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
> >  	int readonly = 0;
> >  	int miss_ndevs = 0;
> >  	int i;
> > 
> > -	read_lock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
> > -	em = lookup_extent_mapping(&map_tree->map_tree, chunk_offset, 1);
> > -	read_unlock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
> > -	if (!em)
> > +	em = get_chunk_map(fs_info, chunk_offset, 1);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(em))
> >  		return 1;
> > 
> >  	map = em->map_lookup;
> > @@ -5119,34 +5120,19 @@ void btrfs_mapping_tree_free(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *tree)
> > 
> >  int btrfs_num_copies(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 logical, u64 len)
> >  {
> > -	struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
> >  	struct extent_map *em;
> >  	struct map_lookup *map;
> > -	struct extent_map_tree *em_tree = &map_tree->map_tree;
> >  	int ret;
> > 
> > -	read_lock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -	em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, logical, len);
> > -	read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * We could return errors for these cases, but that could get ugly and
> > -	 * we'd probably do the same thing which is just not do anything else
> > -	 * and exit, so return 1 so the callers don't try to use other copies.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (!em) {
> > -		btrfs_crit(fs_info, "No mapping for %Lu-%Lu", logical,
> > -			    logical+len);
> > -		return 1;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	if (em->start > logical || em->start + em->len < logical) {
> > -		btrfs_crit(fs_info, "Invalid mapping for %Lu-%Lu, got %Lu-%Lu",
> > -			   logical, logical+len, em->start,
> > -			   em->start + em->len);
> > -		free_extent_map(em);
> > +	em = get_chunk_map(fs_info, logical, len);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(em))
> > +		/*
> > +		 * We could return errors for these cases, but that could get
> > +		 * ugly and we'd probably do the same thing which is just not do
> > +		 * anything else and exit, so return 1 so the callers don't try
> > +		 * to use other copies.
> > +		 */
> >  		return 1;
> > -	}
> > 
> >  	map = em->map_lookup;
> >  	if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1))
> > @@ -5175,15 +5161,11 @@ unsigned long btrfs_full_stripe_len(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  {
> >  	struct extent_map *em;
> >  	struct map_lookup *map;
> > -	struct extent_map_tree *em_tree = &map_tree->map_tree;
> >  	unsigned long len = fs_info->sectorsize;
> > 
> > -	read_lock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -	em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, logical, len);
> > -	read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -	BUG_ON(!em);
> > +	em = get_chunk_map(fs_info, logical, len);
> > +	BUG_ON(IS_ERR(em));
> > 
> > -	BUG_ON(em->start > logical || em->start + em->len < logical);
> >  	map = em->map_lookup;
> >  	if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK)
> >  		len = map->stripe_len * nr_data_stripes(map);
> > @@ -5191,20 +5173,16 @@ unsigned long btrfs_full_stripe_len(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  	return len;
> >  }
> > 
> > -int btrfs_is_parity_mirror(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree,
> > +int btrfs_is_parity_mirror(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  			   u64 logical, u64 len, int mirror_num)
> >  {
> >  	struct extent_map *em;
> >  	struct map_lookup *map;
> > -	struct extent_map_tree *em_tree = &map_tree->map_tree;
> >  	int ret = 0;
> > 
> > -	read_lock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -	em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, logical, len);
> > -	read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -	BUG_ON(!em);
> > +	em = get_chunk_map(fs_info, logical, len);
> > +	BUG_ON(IS_ERR(em));
> > 
> > -	BUG_ON(em->start > logical || em->start + em->len < logical);
> >  	map = em->map_lookup;
> >  	if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK)
> >  		ret = 1;
> > @@ -5324,8 +5302,6 @@ static int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  {
> >  	struct extent_map *em;
> >  	struct map_lookup *map;
> > -	struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
> > -	struct extent_map_tree *em_tree = &map_tree->map_tree;
> >  	u64 offset;
> >  	u64 stripe_offset;
> >  	u64 stripe_end_offset;
> > @@ -5347,23 +5323,9 @@ static int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  	u64 physical_to_patch_in_first_stripe = 0;
> >  	u64 raid56_full_stripe_start = (u64)-1;
> > 
> > -	read_lock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -	em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, logical, *length);
> > -	read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -
> > -	if (!em) {
> > -		btrfs_crit(fs_info, "unable to find logical %llu len %llu",
> > -			logical, *length);
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	if (em->start > logical || em->start + em->len < logical) {
> > -		btrfs_crit(fs_info,
> > -			   "found a bad mapping, wanted %Lu, found %Lu-%Lu",
> > -			   logical, em->start, em->start + em->len);
> > -		free_extent_map(em);
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -	}
> > +	em = get_chunk_map(fs_info, logical, *length);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(em))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(em);
> > 
> >  	map = em->map_lookup;
> >  	offset = logical - em->start;
> > @@ -5899,8 +5861,6 @@ int btrfs_rmap_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  		     u64 chunk_start, u64 physical, u64 devid,
> >  		     u64 **logical, int *naddrs, int *stripe_len)
> >  {
> > -	struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
> > -	struct extent_map_tree *em_tree = &map_tree->map_tree;
> >  	struct extent_map *em;
> >  	struct map_lookup *map;
> >  	u64 *buf;
> > @@ -5910,24 +5870,11 @@ int btrfs_rmap_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  	u64 rmap_len;
> >  	int i, j, nr = 0;
> > 
> > -	read_lock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -	em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, chunk_start, 1);
> > -	read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
> > -
> > -	if (!em) {
> > -		btrfs_err(fs_info, "couldn't find em for chunk %Lu",
> > -			chunk_start);
> > +	em = get_chunk_map(fs_info, chunk_start, 1);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(em))
> >  		return -EIO;
> > -	}
> > 
> > -	if (em->start != chunk_start) {
> > -		btrfs_err(fs_info, "bad chunk start, em=%Lu, wanted=%Lu",
> > -		       em->start, chunk_start);
> > -		free_extent_map(em);
> > -		return -EIO;
> > -	}
> >  	map = em->map_lookup;
> > -
> >  	length = em->len;
> >  	rmap_len = map->stripe_len;
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > index 24ba6bc..bd5f6cd 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ void btrfs_destroy_dev_replace_tgtdev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  void btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev_for_resume(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  					      struct btrfs_device *tgtdev);
> >  void btrfs_scratch_superblocks(struct block_device *bdev, char *device_path);
> > -int btrfs_is_parity_mirror(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree,
> > +int btrfs_is_parity_mirror(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  			   u64 logical, u64 len, int mirror_num);
> >  unsigned long btrfs_full_stripe_len(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  				    struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree,
> > 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-01  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-18  1:28 [PATCH 0/7] cleanup __btrfs_map_block Liu Bo
2017-02-18  1:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] Btrfs: create a helper for getting chunk map Liu Bo
2017-02-20  3:20   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-01  2:19     ` Liu Bo [this message]
2017-02-18  1:28 ` [PATCH 2/7] Btrfs: separate DISCARD from __btrfs_map_block Liu Bo
2017-02-20  3:54   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-06 19:49     ` Liu Bo
2017-02-18  1:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] Btrfs: introduce a function to get extra mirror from replace Liu Bo
2017-02-20  6:26   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-02-18  1:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] Btrfs: handle operations for device replace separately Liu Bo
2017-02-20  6:30   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-02-18  1:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] Btrfs: do not add extra mirror when dev_replace target dev is not available Liu Bo
2017-02-20  6:39   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-02-18  1:28 ` [PATCH 6/7] Btrfs: helper for ops that requires full stripe Liu Bo
2017-02-20  6:40   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-02-18  1:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] Btrfs: convert BUG_ON to WARN_ON Liu Bo
2017-02-20  6:42   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-02-18 11:03 ` [PATCH 0/7] cleanup __btrfs_map_block Mike Fleetwood
2017-02-20  3:12 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-14 17:27 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170301021955.GC9546@lim.localdomain \
    --to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).