From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] btrfs: Prevent scrub recheck from racing with dev replace
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:08:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170329180820.GD8328@lim.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170329013322.1323-6-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:33:22AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> scrub_setup_recheck_block() calls btrfs_map_sblock() and then access
> bbio without protection of bio_counter.
>
s/access/accesses/
> This can leads to use-after-free if racing with dev replace cancel.
>
s/leads/lead/
> Fix it by increasing bio_counter before calling btrfs_map_sblock() and
> decrease the bio_counter when corresponding recover is finished.
>
*decreasing
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Thanks,
-liubo
> Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
> Reported-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> index b8c49074d1b3..84b077c993c0 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> @@ -1072,9 +1072,11 @@ static inline void scrub_get_recover(struct scrub_recover *recover)
> atomic_inc(&recover->refs);
> }
>
> -static inline void scrub_put_recover(struct scrub_recover *recover)
> +static inline void scrub_put_recover(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> + struct scrub_recover *recover)
> {
> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&recover->refs)) {
> + btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
> btrfs_put_bbio(recover->bbio);
> kfree(recover);
> }
> @@ -1464,7 +1466,7 @@ static int scrub_handle_errored_block(struct scrub_block *sblock_to_check)
> sblock->pagev[page_index]->sblock = NULL;
> recover = sblock->pagev[page_index]->recover;
> if (recover) {
> - scrub_put_recover(recover);
> + scrub_put_recover(fs_info, recover);
> sblock->pagev[page_index]->recover =
> NULL;
> }
> @@ -1556,16 +1558,19 @@ static int scrub_setup_recheck_block(struct scrub_block *original_sblock,
> * with a length of PAGE_SIZE, each returned stripe
> * represents one mirror
> */
> + btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked(fs_info);
> ret = btrfs_map_sblock(fs_info, BTRFS_MAP_GET_READ_MIRRORS,
> logical, &mapped_length, &bbio, 0, 1);
> if (ret || !bbio || mapped_length < sublen) {
> btrfs_put_bbio(bbio);
> + btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> recover = kzalloc(sizeof(struct scrub_recover), GFP_NOFS);
> if (!recover) {
> btrfs_put_bbio(bbio);
> + btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> @@ -1591,7 +1596,7 @@ static int scrub_setup_recheck_block(struct scrub_block *original_sblock,
> spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock);
> sctx->stat.malloc_errors++;
> spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock);
> - scrub_put_recover(recover);
> + scrub_put_recover(fs_info, recover);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> scrub_page_get(page);
> @@ -1633,7 +1638,7 @@ static int scrub_setup_recheck_block(struct scrub_block *original_sblock,
> scrub_get_recover(recover);
> page->recover = recover;
> }
> - scrub_put_recover(recover);
> + scrub_put_recover(fs_info, recover);
> length -= sublen;
> logical += sublen;
> page_index++;
> --
> 2.12.1
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-29 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-29 1:33 [PATCH v3 0/5] raid56: scrub related fixes Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] btrfs: scrub: Introduce full stripe lock for RAID56 Qu Wenruo
2017-03-30 0:34 ` Liu Bo
2017-03-30 1:03 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-30 10:31 ` David Sterba
2017-03-31 2:03 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-31 17:26 ` David Sterba
2017-04-03 0:43 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] btrfs: scrub: Fix RAID56 recovery race condition Qu Wenruo
2017-03-30 0:51 ` Liu Bo
2017-03-30 3:24 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] btrfs: scrub: Don't append on-disk pages for raid56 scrub Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29 18:00 ` Liu Bo
2017-03-29 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] btrfs: Wait flighting bio before freeing target device for raid56 Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29 18:05 ` Liu Bo
2017-03-29 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] btrfs: Prevent scrub recheck from racing with dev replace Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29 18:08 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2017-03-30 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] raid56: scrub related fixes David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170329180820.GD8328@lim.localdomain \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).