linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] btrfs: Prevent scrub recheck from racing with dev replace
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:08:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170329180820.GD8328@lim.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170329013322.1323-6-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:33:22AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> scrub_setup_recheck_block() calls btrfs_map_sblock() and then access
> bbio without protection of bio_counter.
>

s/access/accesses/

> This can leads to use-after-free if racing with dev replace cancel.
>

s/leads/lead/

> Fix it by increasing bio_counter before calling btrfs_map_sblock() and
> decrease the bio_counter when corresponding recover is finished.
>

*decreasing

Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>

Thanks,

-liubo


> Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
> Reported-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> index b8c49074d1b3..84b077c993c0 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> @@ -1072,9 +1072,11 @@ static inline void scrub_get_recover(struct scrub_recover *recover)
>  	atomic_inc(&recover->refs);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void scrub_put_recover(struct scrub_recover *recover)
> +static inline void scrub_put_recover(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> +				     struct scrub_recover *recover)
>  {
>  	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&recover->refs)) {
> +		btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
>  		btrfs_put_bbio(recover->bbio);
>  		kfree(recover);
>  	}
> @@ -1464,7 +1466,7 @@ static int scrub_handle_errored_block(struct scrub_block *sblock_to_check)
>  				sblock->pagev[page_index]->sblock = NULL;
>  				recover = sblock->pagev[page_index]->recover;
>  				if (recover) {
> -					scrub_put_recover(recover);
> +					scrub_put_recover(fs_info, recover);
>  					sblock->pagev[page_index]->recover =
>  									NULL;
>  				}
> @@ -1556,16 +1558,19 @@ static int scrub_setup_recheck_block(struct scrub_block *original_sblock,
>  		 * with a length of PAGE_SIZE, each returned stripe
>  		 * represents one mirror
>  		 */
> +		btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked(fs_info);
>  		ret = btrfs_map_sblock(fs_info, BTRFS_MAP_GET_READ_MIRRORS,
>  				logical, &mapped_length, &bbio, 0, 1);
>  		if (ret || !bbio || mapped_length < sublen) {
>  			btrfs_put_bbio(bbio);
> +			btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
>  			return -EIO;
>  		}
>  
>  		recover = kzalloc(sizeof(struct scrub_recover), GFP_NOFS);
>  		if (!recover) {
>  			btrfs_put_bbio(bbio);
> +			btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
>  			return -ENOMEM;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -1591,7 +1596,7 @@ static int scrub_setup_recheck_block(struct scrub_block *original_sblock,
>  				spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock);
>  				sctx->stat.malloc_errors++;
>  				spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock);
> -				scrub_put_recover(recover);
> +				scrub_put_recover(fs_info, recover);
>  				return -ENOMEM;
>  			}
>  			scrub_page_get(page);
> @@ -1633,7 +1638,7 @@ static int scrub_setup_recheck_block(struct scrub_block *original_sblock,
>  			scrub_get_recover(recover);
>  			page->recover = recover;
>  		}
> -		scrub_put_recover(recover);
> +		scrub_put_recover(fs_info, recover);
>  		length -= sublen;
>  		logical += sublen;
>  		page_index++;
> -- 
> 2.12.1
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-29 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-29  1:33 [PATCH v3 0/5] raid56: scrub related fixes Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] btrfs: scrub: Introduce full stripe lock for RAID56 Qu Wenruo
2017-03-30  0:34   ` Liu Bo
2017-03-30  1:03     ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-30 10:31       ` David Sterba
2017-03-31  2:03         ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-31 17:26           ` David Sterba
2017-04-03  0:43             ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] btrfs: scrub: Fix RAID56 recovery race condition Qu Wenruo
2017-03-30  0:51   ` Liu Bo
2017-03-30  3:24     ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] btrfs: scrub: Don't append on-disk pages for raid56 scrub Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29 18:00   ` Liu Bo
2017-03-29  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] btrfs: Wait flighting bio before freeing target device for raid56 Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29 18:05   ` Liu Bo
2017-03-29  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] btrfs: Prevent scrub recheck from racing with dev replace Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29 18:08   ` Liu Bo [this message]
2017-03-30 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] raid56: scrub related fixes David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170329180820.GD8328@lim.localdomain \
    --to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).