linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] btrfs: scrub: Fix RAID56 recovery race condition
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:51:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170330005117.GB15452@lim.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170329013322.1323-3-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:33:19AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[...]
> 
> Reported-by: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> index ab33b9a8aac2..f92d2512f4f3 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> @@ -1129,6 +1129,17 @@ static int scrub_handle_errored_block(struct scrub_block *sblock_to_check)
>  	have_csum = sblock_to_check->pagev[0]->have_csum;
>  	dev = sblock_to_check->pagev[0]->dev;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * For RAID5/6 race can happen for different dev scrub thread.
> +	 * For data corruption, Parity and Data thread will both try
> +	 * to recovery the data.
> +	 * Race can lead to double added csum error, or even unrecoverable
> +	 * error.
> +	 */
> +	ret = lock_full_stripe(fs_info, logical);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +

Firstly, sctx->stat needs to be set with errors before returning errors.

Secondly, I think the critical section starts right before re-checking the
failed mirror, doesn't it?  If so, we could get the benefit from
sblock_bad->page since the page->recover can tell if this is a raid56 profile so
that we may save a searching for block group.

>  	if (sctx->is_dev_replace && !is_metadata && !have_csum) {
>  		sblocks_for_recheck = NULL;
>  		goto nodatasum_case;
> @@ -1463,6 +1474,9 @@ static int scrub_handle_errored_block(struct scrub_block *sblock_to_check)
>  		kfree(sblocks_for_recheck);
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = unlock_full_stripe(fs_info, logical);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;

Seems that the callers of scrub_handle_errored_block doesn't care about @ret.

And could you please put a 'locked' flag after taking the lock succesfully?
Otherwise every raid profile has to check block group for raid flag.

Thanks,

-liubo
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.12.1
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-30  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-29  1:33 [PATCH v3 0/5] raid56: scrub related fixes Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] btrfs: scrub: Introduce full stripe lock for RAID56 Qu Wenruo
2017-03-30  0:34   ` Liu Bo
2017-03-30  1:03     ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-30 10:31       ` David Sterba
2017-03-31  2:03         ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-31 17:26           ` David Sterba
2017-04-03  0:43             ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] btrfs: scrub: Fix RAID56 recovery race condition Qu Wenruo
2017-03-30  0:51   ` Liu Bo [this message]
2017-03-30  3:24     ` Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] btrfs: scrub: Don't append on-disk pages for raid56 scrub Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29 18:00   ` Liu Bo
2017-03-29  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] btrfs: Wait flighting bio before freeing target device for raid56 Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29 18:05   ` Liu Bo
2017-03-29  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] btrfs: Prevent scrub recheck from racing with dev replace Qu Wenruo
2017-03-29 18:08   ` Liu Bo
2017-03-30 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] raid56: scrub related fixes David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170330005117.GB15452@lim.localdomain \
    --to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).