From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>,
Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>,
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
Subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: drop the nossd flag when remounting with -o ssd
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 22:08:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170331200850.7067-1-kilobyte@angband.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170331171016.GN4781@twin.jikos.cz>
And when turning on nossd, drop ssd_spread.
Reported-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
---
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:10:16PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 06:00:08PM +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> > On 03/31/2017 05:19 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > Not sure if setting NOSSD should also disable SSD_SPREAD, there's currently
> > > no way to disable that option once set.
>
> Missing inverse of ssd_spread is probably unintentional, as we once
> added all complementary no* options, this one was forgotten.
>
> And yes, nossd should turn off ssd and ssd_spread, as ssd_spread without
> ssd does not nothing anyway.
Added that.
> > How did you test this?
> >
> > This was also my first thought, but here's a weird thing:
> >
> > -# mount -o nossd /dev/sdx /mnt/btrfs/
> >
> > BTRFS info (device sdx): not using ssd allocation scheme
> >
> > -# mount -o remount,ssd /mnt/btrfs/
> >
> > BTRFS info (device sdx): use ssd allocation scheme
> >
> > -# mount -o remount,nossd /mnt/btrfs/
> >
> > BTRFS info (device sdx): use ssd allocation scheme
> >
> > That means that the case Opt_nossd: is never reached when doing this?
Seems to work for me:
[/tmp]# mount -onoatime foo /mnt/vol1
[ 619.436745] BTRFS: device fsid 954fd6c3-b3ce-4355-b79a-60ece7a6a4e0 devid 1 transid 5 /dev/loop0
[ 619.438625] BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled
[ 619.438627] BTRFS info (device loop0): has skinny extents
[ 619.438629] BTRFS info (device loop0): flagging fs with big metadata feature
[ 619.441989] BTRFS info (device loop0): creating UUID tree
[/tmp]# mount -oremount,ssd /mnt/vol1
[ 629.755584] BTRFS info (device loop0): use ssd allocation scheme
[ 629.755589] BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled
[/tmp]# mount -oremount,nossd /mnt/vol1
[ 633.675867] BTRFS info (device loop0): not using ssd allocation scheme
[ 633.675872] BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled
> > The fact that nossd,ssd,ssd_spread are different options complicates the
> > whole thing, compared to e.g. autodefrag, noautodefrag.
>
> I think the the ssd flags reflect the autodetection of ssd, unlike
> autodefrag and others.
The autodetection works for /dev/sd* and /dev/mmcblk*, but not for most
other devices.
Two examples:
nbd to a piece of rotating rust says:
[45697.575192] BTRFS info (device nbd0): detected SSD devices, enabling SSD mode
loop on tmpfs (and in case it spills, all swap is on ssd):
claims it's rotational
> The ssd options says "enable the ssd mode", but it could be also
> auto-detected if the non-rotational device is detected.
>
> nossd says, "do not do the autodetection, even if it's a non-rot
> device, also disable all ssd modes".
These two options are nice whenever the autodetection goes wrong.
> So Adam's patch needs to be updated so NOSSD also disables SSD_SPREAD.
M'kay, updated this patch.
> Adding the 'nossd_spread' would be good to have, even if it might be
> just a marginal usecase.
Not sure if there's much point. In any case, that's a separate patch.
Should I add one while we're here?
Meow!
fs/btrfs/super.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 06bd9b332e18..ac1ca22d0c34 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -549,16 +549,19 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, char *options,
case Opt_ssd:
btrfs_set_and_info(info, SSD,
"use ssd allocation scheme");
+ btrfs_clear_opt(info->mount_opt, NOSSD);
break;
case Opt_ssd_spread:
btrfs_set_and_info(info, SSD_SPREAD,
"use spread ssd allocation scheme");
btrfs_set_opt(info->mount_opt, SSD);
+ btrfs_clear_opt(info->mount_opt, NOSSD);
break;
case Opt_nossd:
btrfs_set_and_info(info, NOSSD,
"not using ssd allocation scheme");
btrfs_clear_opt(info->mount_opt, SSD);
+ btrfs_clear_opt(info->mount_opt, SSD_SPREAD);
break;
case Opt_barrier:
btrfs_clear_and_info(info, NOBARRIER,
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-31 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-30 23:01 Cosmetics bug: remounting ssd does not clear nossd Hans van Kranenburg
2017-03-31 15:19 ` [PATCH] btrfs: drop the nossd flag when remounting with -o ssd Adam Borowski
2017-03-31 16:00 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-03-31 17:10 ` David Sterba
2017-03-31 20:08 ` Adam Borowski [this message]
2017-03-31 20:24 ` [PATCH v2] " Hans van Kranenburg
2017-03-31 20:43 ` Adam Borowski
2017-03-31 20:50 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-04-03 12:24 ` David Sterba
2017-04-03 22:43 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-04-10 17:35 ` David Sterba
2017-04-03 12:25 ` David Sterba
2017-04-15 19:12 ` [PATCH] " Hans van Kranenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170331200850.7067-1-kilobyte@angband.pl \
--to=kilobyte@angband.pl \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).