From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54926 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754204AbdEIPl3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2017 11:41:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 17:41:21 +0200 From: David Sterba To: "Lakshmipathi.G" Cc: quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: btrfs-convert: Add larger device support Message-ID: <20170509154120.GG5491@suse.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz References: <20170427100534.GA10404@giis.co.in> <20170502150601.GK23260@twin.jikos.cz> <20170502153556.GM23260@twin.jikos.cz> <20170503163819.GA10030@giis.co.in> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 07:46:08PM +0530, Lakshmipathi.G wrote: > created a test script but it fail to detect mk2fs. Test script 009 > also produces: > > # ./convert-tests/009-common-inode-flags/test.sh > [TEST/conv] common inode flags test, btrfs defaults > failed: mke2fs -t ext4 -b 4096 -F > /home/laks/centos/laks/BTRFS/btrfs-progs/tests/test.img > > Seems like run_check fails to detect mke2fs command. Something wrong > with my setup or issue with run_check? Does the mke2fs command exist on your system? We maybe want to use mkfs.ext4 directly.