* [fs-btrfs] question about apparent useless function call
@ 2017-05-17 22:37 Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-05-18 14:02 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2017-05-17 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason, Josef Bacik, David Sterba; +Cc: linux-btrfs, linux-kernel
Hello everybody,
While looking into Coverity ID 1398149 I ran into the following piece
of code at fs/btrfs/zlib.c:295:
295done:
296 zlib_inflateEnd(&workspace->strm);
297 if (data_in)
298 kunmap(pages_in[page_in_index]);
299 if (!ret)
300 zero_fill_bio(orig_bio);
301 return ret;
302}
The issue here is that calling function zlib_inflateEnd() at line 296
_seems_ to be useless once this function _seems_ to be only useful for
its return value, which is ignored. The same for line 388.
Can someone help me understand what is the purpose of these calls?
Should them be removed, or the return value actually evaluated?
I'd really appreciate any comment on this.
Thank you!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [fs-btrfs] question about apparent useless function call
2017-05-17 22:37 [fs-btrfs] question about apparent useless function call Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2017-05-18 14:02 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2017-05-18 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo A. R. Silva; +Cc: Chris Mason, Josef Bacik, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 05:37:44PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> While looking into Coverity ID 1398149 I ran into the following piece
> of code at fs/btrfs/zlib.c:295:
>
> 295done:
> 296 zlib_inflateEnd(&workspace->strm);
> 297 if (data_in)
> 298 kunmap(pages_in[page_in_index]);
> 299 if (!ret)
> 300 zero_fill_bio(orig_bio);
> 301 return ret;
> 302}
>
> The issue here is that calling function zlib_inflateEnd() at line 296
> _seems_ to be useless once this function _seems_ to be only useful for
> its return value, which is ignored. The same for line 388.
>
> Can someone help me understand what is the purpose of these calls?
> Should them be removed, or the return value actually evaluated?
I don't think that removing the functions is a good idea, even if
they're trivial in the end. The error value needs to be checked but
seems that the only thing we can do at that point is to inform the user
that something bad happen inside the decompressor. The cleanup (kunmap
or memset) has to be done anyway.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-18 14:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-17 22:37 [fs-btrfs] question about apparent useless function call Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-05-18 14:02 ` David Sterba
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).