linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	dsterba@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Introduce blkdev_issue_flush_no_wait()
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 00:09:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170521070945.GC10453@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d97acfdb-3ab1-5722-f341-a8feba1a72ef@oracle.com>

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:31:32PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>  You mean at btrfs: write_dev_flush()
>    OR
>  block: blkdev_issue_flush() ?
>  Where I find
>         q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>         if (!q)
>                 return -ENXIO
>  isn't needed as anyway generic_make_request_checks() will
>  check that down below.
>  Not too sure about the other two checks though.

I was looking at your new function, but indeed it seems like the
function is mostly copy & pasted from blkdev_issue_flush.

The bdev->bd_disk, !bdev_get_queue and q->make_request_fn checks
are all things you don't need, any blkdev_issue_flush should not
either, although I'll need to look into the weird loop workaround
again, which doesn't make much sense to me.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-21  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-16  9:39 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Introduce blkdev_issue_flush_no_wait() Anand Jain
2017-05-16  9:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: " Anand Jain
2017-05-16 11:56   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-18  9:31     ` Anand Jain
2017-05-21  7:09       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-05-24  8:42         ` Anand Jain
2017-05-16  9:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: Use blkdev_issue_flush_no_wait() Anand Jain
2017-05-16 12:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-16 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Introduce blkdev_issue_flush_no_wait() Bart Van Assche
2017-05-17 17:14   ` David Sterba
2017-05-18  9:31     ` Anand Jain
2017-05-18  9:27   ` Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170521070945.GC10453@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).