From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: common: Make _test_mount to include MOUNT_OPTIONS to allow consistent _test_cycle_mount
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 12:24:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170524042434.GH7250@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68cba4cb-538a-c689-e13a-70028ca0fc0a@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:22:25AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> At 05/23/2017 07:13 PM, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 04:02:05PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > > [BUG]
> > > If using MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o nodatasum" and btrfs to run genierc/142
> > > generic/143 and generic/154, it will cause false alert like:
> > > cp: failed to clone '/mnt/test/test-154/file2' from '/mnt/test/test-154/file1': Invalid argument
> >
> > MOUNT_OPTIONS is for scratch mount, and TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS is for test
> > dev mount, so I think setting TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS to "-o nodatasum"
> > should fix your problem.
>
> Nope, the problem is the inconsistent of TEST_MNT setup.
It does fix the failure for me, did I miss anything?
# MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o nodatasum" TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS="-o nodatasum" ./check generic/142 generic/143 generic/154
FSTYP -- btrfs
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 dhcp-66-86-11 4.12.0-rc1
MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sda6
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o nodatasum -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/sda6 /mnt/testarea/scratch
generic/142 2s ... 1s
generic/143 18s
generic/154 1s
Ran: generic/142 generic/143 generic/154
Passed all 3 tests
Thanks,
Eryu
>
> As I described, the TEST_MNT is setup *with* MOUNT_OPTIONS for the 1st time,
> maybe by "check" script.
>
> But _test_cycle_mount() uses TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS otherthan MOUNT_OPTIONS, and
> leads to the problem.
>
> If using TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS, then 1st setup should also use
> TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
> >
> > Yeah, MOUNT_OPTIONS and TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS (and almost all other global
> > variables) are not documented properly..
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eryu
> >
> > >
> > > [REASON]
> > > It is caused by _test_cycle_mount function, which unmount test device,
> > > but when trying to re-mount it again using _test_mount(), we don't pass
> > > $MOUNT_OPTIONS.
> > >
> > > So this makes mount options differs between _test_cycle_mount().
> > >
> > > And btrfs doesn't allow different csum flags between reflink source and
> > > destination inodes, so it returns -EINVAL for reflink operation.
> > >
> > > [FIX]
> > > Fix it by passing $MOUNT_OPTIONS to _test_mount(), so that
> > > _test_cycle_mount() won't cause different mount options.
> > > So btrfs with "-o nodatasum" mount option can pass generic/14[23]
> > > and generic/154 without false alert.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > > ---
> > > common/rc | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > > index ba215961..a591907c 100644
> > > --- a/common/rc
> > > +++ b/common/rc
> > > @@ -522,7 +522,8 @@ _test_mount()
> > > return $?
> > > fi
> > > _test_options mount
> > > - _mount -t $FSTYP $TEST_OPTIONS $TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS $SELINUX_MOUNT_OPTIONS $* $TEST_DEV $TEST_DIR
> > > + _mount -t $FSTYP $TEST_OPTIONS $TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS $SELINUX_MOUNT_OPTIONS \
> > > + $MOUNT_OPTIONS $* $TEST_DEV $TEST_DIR
> > > }
> > > _test_unmount()
> > > --
> > > 2.13.0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-24 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-23 8:02 [PATCH] fstests: common: Make _test_mount to include MOUNT_OPTIONS to allow consistent _test_cycle_mount Qu Wenruo
2017-05-23 11:13 ` Eryu Guan
2017-05-24 0:22 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-05-24 4:24 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2017-05-24 4:28 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-05-24 5:08 ` Eryu Guan
2017-05-24 5:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-05-24 7:58 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-05-24 9:22 ` Eryu Guan
2017-05-24 9:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-05-25 3:26 ` Eryu Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170524042434.GH7250@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).