From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: darrick.wong@oracle.com
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
clm@fb.com, jbacik@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com, matorola@gmail.com,
sandeen@sandeen.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: crypto: Work around deallocated stack frame reference gcc bug on sparc.
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 15:55:29 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170602.155529.599501370529389401.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170602.143906.818489457650113258.davem@davemloft.net>
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:08:08 -0700
>
>> ext4/jbd2's crc32c implementations will also need a fix like this for
>> {ext4,jbd2}_chksum. Note that both of these modules call the crypto api
>> directly to avoid a static dependence on libcrc32c; this was done to
>> reduce kernel footprint for applications that don't need it. (ext2,
>> ext3, and ext4 before the metadata_csum feature existed).
>
> Good catch. I even looked at that code the other day so should
> have spotted it as well.
>
> I'll integrate fixes for those into my patch when I get a chance,
> thanks!
Actually, ext4 doesn't trigger the problem because the on-stack object
used in ext4 is a fixed size at compile time. Which is technically an
ill-advised assumption to make. Even the generic libcrc32c.c doesn't
assume that the context area is 4 bytes for crc32c.
Anyways, back to the main point, the gcc bug only triggers when
alloca() like constructs are used.
That's why I scanned for SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK() to see exactly where
the workaround is necessary.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-02 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-02 15:28 crypto: Work around deallocated stack frame reference gcc bug on sparc David Miller
2017-06-02 18:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-02 18:39 ` David Miller
2017-06-02 19:55 ` David Miller [this message]
2017-06-06 19:04 ` David Miller
2017-06-07 3:04 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170602.155529.599501370529389401.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matorola@gmail.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).