From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f51.google.com ([74.125.83.51]:32941 "EHLO mail-pg0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751444AbdFGRhj (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 13:37:39 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f185so7573829pgc.0 for ; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 10:37:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:37:37 -0700 From: Omar Sandoval To: Holger =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hoffst=E4tte?= Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Josef Bacik , Liu Bo , kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Btrfs: fix total_bytes_pinned counter Message-ID: <20170607173737.GB7481@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:48:05PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On 06/07/17 01:45, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > From: Omar Sandoval > > > > This series fixes several problems with the total_bytes_pinned counter. > > Patches 1 and 2 are cleanups. Patches 3 and 4 are straightforward fixes. > > Patch 5 is prep for patch 6. Patch 6 is the most complicated fix. > > Patches 5 and 6 are ugly, I'd love any suggestions for a cleaner fix. > > Finally, patch 7 adds a warning to catch similar issues in the future. > > Since this didn't really change the code significantly from the previous > version (except for the addition of minor patches 2+7) have a > > Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte Thanks for testing, Holger!