From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Btrfs: make add_pinned_bytes() take an s64 num_bytes instead of u64
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:34:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170612173445.GB18452@lim.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c13a2336c1d68648413e7c4beac574999c5d1ba4.1496792333.git.osandov@fb.com>
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 04:45:26PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
>
> There are a few places where we pass in a negative num_bytes, so make it
> signed for clarity. Also move it up in the file since later patches will
> need it there.
>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-liubo
> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index e390451c72e6..7c01b4e9e3b6 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -766,6 +766,26 @@ static struct btrfs_space_info *__find_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static void add_pinned_bytes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, s64 num_bytes,
> + u64 owner, u64 root_objectid)
> +{
> + struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
> + u64 flags;
> +
> + if (owner < BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID) {
> + if (root_objectid == BTRFS_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID)
> + flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM;
> + else
> + flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA;
> + } else {
> + flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA;
> + }
> +
> + space_info = __find_space_info(fs_info, flags);
> + BUG_ON(!space_info); /* Logic bug */
> + percpu_counter_add(&space_info->total_bytes_pinned, num_bytes);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * after adding space to the filesystem, we need to clear the full flags
> * on all the space infos.
> @@ -6793,27 +6813,6 @@ int btrfs_finish_extent_commit(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void add_pinned_bytes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 num_bytes,
> - u64 owner, u64 root_objectid)
> -{
> - struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
> - u64 flags;
> -
> - if (owner < BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID) {
> - if (root_objectid == BTRFS_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID)
> - flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM;
> - else
> - flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA;
> - } else {
> - flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA;
> - }
> -
> - space_info = __find_space_info(fs_info, flags);
> - BUG_ON(!space_info); /* Logic bug */
> - percpu_counter_add(&space_info->total_bytes_pinned, num_bytes);
> -}
> -
> -
> static int __btrfs_free_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
> struct btrfs_delayed_ref_node *node, u64 parent,
> --
> 2.13.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-12 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-06 23:45 [PATCH 0/7] Btrfs: fix total_bytes_pinned counter Omar Sandoval
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 1/7] Btrfs: make add_pinned_bytes() take an s64 num_bytes instead of u64 Omar Sandoval
2017-06-12 13:39 ` David Sterba
2017-06-12 17:34 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 2/7] Btrfs: make BUG_ON() in add_pinned_bytes() an ASSERT() Omar Sandoval
2017-06-12 13:26 ` David Sterba
2017-06-21 17:31 ` David Sterba
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 3/7] Btrfs: update total_bytes_pinned when pinning down extents Omar Sandoval
2017-06-12 17:37 ` Liu Bo
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 4/7] Btrfs: always account pinned bytes when dropping a tree block ref Omar Sandoval
2017-06-07 20:20 ` Liu Bo
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 5/7] Btrfs: return old and new total ref mods when adding delayed refs Omar Sandoval
2017-06-07 20:06 ` Liu Bo
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 6/7] Btrfs: rework delayed ref total_bytes_pinned accounting Omar Sandoval
2017-06-07 20:18 ` Liu Bo
2017-06-09 23:38 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 7/7] Btrfs: warn if total_bytes_pinned is non-zero on unmount Omar Sandoval
2017-06-07 20:22 ` Liu Bo
2017-06-09 23:45 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-06-13 18:35 ` Jeff Mahoney
2017-06-21 17:40 ` David Sterba
2017-06-07 15:48 ` [PATCH 0/7] Btrfs: fix total_bytes_pinned counter Holger Hoffstätte
2017-06-07 17:37 ` Omar Sandoval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170612173445.GB18452@lim.localdomain \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).