linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Btrfs: make add_pinned_bytes() take an s64 num_bytes instead of u64
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:34:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170612173445.GB18452@lim.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c13a2336c1d68648413e7c4beac574999c5d1ba4.1496792333.git.osandov@fb.com>

On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 04:45:26PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> 
> There are a few places where we pass in a negative num_bytes, so make it
> signed for clarity. Also move it up in the file since later patches will
> need it there.
> 

Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>

-liubo
> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index e390451c72e6..7c01b4e9e3b6 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -766,6 +766,26 @@ static struct btrfs_space_info *__find_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static void add_pinned_bytes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, s64 num_bytes,
> +			     u64 owner, u64 root_objectid)
> +{
> +	struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
> +	u64 flags;
> +
> +	if (owner < BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID) {
> +		if (root_objectid == BTRFS_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID)
> +			flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM;
> +		else
> +			flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA;
> +	} else {
> +		flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA;
> +	}
> +
> +	space_info = __find_space_info(fs_info, flags);
> +	BUG_ON(!space_info); /* Logic bug */
> +	percpu_counter_add(&space_info->total_bytes_pinned, num_bytes);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * after adding space to the filesystem, we need to clear the full flags
>   * on all the space infos.
> @@ -6793,27 +6813,6 @@ int btrfs_finish_extent_commit(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void add_pinned_bytes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 num_bytes,
> -			     u64 owner, u64 root_objectid)
> -{
> -	struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
> -	u64 flags;
> -
> -	if (owner < BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID) {
> -		if (root_objectid == BTRFS_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID)
> -			flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM;
> -		else
> -			flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA;
> -	} else {
> -		flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA;
> -	}
> -
> -	space_info = __find_space_info(fs_info, flags);
> -	BUG_ON(!space_info); /* Logic bug */
> -	percpu_counter_add(&space_info->total_bytes_pinned, num_bytes);
> -}
> -
> -
>  static int __btrfs_free_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  				struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
>  				struct btrfs_delayed_ref_node *node, u64 parent,
> -- 
> 2.13.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-12 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-06 23:45 [PATCH 0/7] Btrfs: fix total_bytes_pinned counter Omar Sandoval
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 1/7] Btrfs: make add_pinned_bytes() take an s64 num_bytes instead of u64 Omar Sandoval
2017-06-12 13:39   ` David Sterba
2017-06-12 17:34   ` Liu Bo [this message]
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 2/7] Btrfs: make BUG_ON() in add_pinned_bytes() an ASSERT() Omar Sandoval
2017-06-12 13:26   ` David Sterba
2017-06-21 17:31   ` David Sterba
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 3/7] Btrfs: update total_bytes_pinned when pinning down extents Omar Sandoval
2017-06-12 17:37   ` Liu Bo
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 4/7] Btrfs: always account pinned bytes when dropping a tree block ref Omar Sandoval
2017-06-07 20:20   ` Liu Bo
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 5/7] Btrfs: return old and new total ref mods when adding delayed refs Omar Sandoval
2017-06-07 20:06   ` Liu Bo
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 6/7] Btrfs: rework delayed ref total_bytes_pinned accounting Omar Sandoval
2017-06-07 20:18   ` Liu Bo
2017-06-09 23:38     ` Omar Sandoval
2017-06-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 7/7] Btrfs: warn if total_bytes_pinned is non-zero on unmount Omar Sandoval
2017-06-07 20:22   ` Liu Bo
2017-06-09 23:45     ` Omar Sandoval
2017-06-13 18:35   ` Jeff Mahoney
2017-06-21 17:40   ` David Sterba
2017-06-07 15:48 ` [PATCH 0/7] Btrfs: fix total_bytes_pinned counter Holger Hoffstätte
2017-06-07 17:37   ` Omar Sandoval

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170612173445.GB18452@lim.localdomain \
    --to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).