From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:33533 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752100AbdFMGOg (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 02:14:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:14:31 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Goldwyn Rodrigues Cc: Al Viro , Christoph Hellwig , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, adam.manzanares@wdc.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10 v11] No wait AIO Message-ID: <20170613061431.GA11432@infradead.org> References: <20170606111939.27272-1-rgoldwyn@suse.de> <20170608073910.GB9292@infradead.org> <20170610053441.GD6365@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <58bbe95e-5a4a-4387-3a00-16ed2e861bd3@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <58bbe95e-5a4a-4387-3a00-16ed2e861bd3@suse.de> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 05:38:13PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > We had FS_NOWAIT in filesystem type flags (in v3), but retracted it > later in v4. A per-fs flag is wrong as file_operation may have different capabilities. > I will work on adding FMODE_AIO_NOWAIT in the meantime. If Al prefers that let's go with it for now. One other thing I'd love is a supported flags field in struct file_operations that we can compare the flags against. Al, does that sound good as well? > > Thanks, > > -- > Goldwyn ---end quoted text---