linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] btrfs: fix validation of XATTR_ITEM dir items
@ 2017-06-29 18:20 David Sterba
  2017-06-29 18:20 ` [PATCH] btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr David Sterba
  2017-07-03  9:05 ` [PATCH v2] btrfs: fix validation of XATTR_ITEM dir items Su Yue
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2017-06-29 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: suy.fnst, fdmanana, nborisov, David Sterba

The XATTR_ITEM is a type of a directory item so we use the common
validator helper. Unlike other dir items, it can have data. The way the
name len validation is currently implemented does not reflect that. We'd
have to adjust by the data_len when comparing the read and item limits.

However, this will not work for multi-item xattr dir items.

Example from tree dump of generic/337:

        item 7 key (257 XATTR_ITEM 751495445) itemoff 15667 itemsize 147
                location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR
                transid 8 data_len 3 name_len 11
                name: user.foobar
                data 123
                location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR
                transid 8 data_len 6 name_len 13
                name: user.WvG1c1Td
                data qwerty
                location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR
                transid 8 data_len 5 name_len 19
                name: user.J3__T_Km3dVsW_
                data hello

At the point of btrfs_is_name_len_valid call we don't have access to the
data_len value of the 2nd and 3rd sub-item. So simple btrfs_dir_data_len(leaf,
di) would always return 3, although we'd need to get 6 and 5 respectively to
get the claculations right. (read_end + name_len + data_len vs item_end)

We'd have to also pass data_len externally, which is not point of the
name validation. The last check is supposed to test if there's at least
one dir item space after the one we're processing. I don't think this is
particularly useful, validation of the next item would catch that too.
So the check is removed and we don't weaken the validation. Now tests
btrfs/048, btrfs/053, generic/273 and generic/337 pass.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---

 fs/btrfs/dir-item.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/dir-item.c b/fs/btrfs/dir-item.c
index 2b00dd746118..41cb9196eaa8 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/dir-item.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/dir-item.c
@@ -550,14 +550,6 @@ bool btrfs_is_name_len_valid(struct extent_buffer *leaf, int slot,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * This may be the last item in the slot
-	 * Or same type item(s) is left between read_end and item_end
-	 */
-	if (item_end != read_end && item_end - read_end < size) {
-		ret = false;
-		goto out;
-	}
 out:
 	if (!ret)
 		btrfs_crit(fs_info, "invalid dir item name len: %u",
-- 
2.13.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-03  9:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-29 18:20 [PATCH v2] btrfs: fix validation of XATTR_ITEM dir items David Sterba
2017-06-29 18:20 ` [PATCH] btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr David Sterba
2017-06-29 18:24   ` David Sterba
2017-07-03  9:05 ` [PATCH v2] btrfs: fix validation of XATTR_ITEM dir items Su Yue

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).