Re: ctree.c:197: update_ref_for_cow: BUG_ON `ret` triggered, value -5

[Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>]

On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 10:39:53PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 10:37:18PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>> I'm still trying to fix my filesystem.
>> It seems to work well enough since the damage is apparently localized, but
>> I'd really want check --repair to actually bring it back to a working
>> state, but now it's crashing

I apologise for my late reply. As a colleague left, I have to take over his
work recently.

>> 
>> This is btrfs tools from git from a few days ago
>> 
>> Failed to find [4068943577088, 168, 16384]
>> btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 4068943577088 parent 0 root 4  owner 1 offset 0
>> Failed to find [5905106075648, 168, 16384]
>> btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 5906282119168 parent 0 root 4  owner 0 offset 1
>> Failed to find [21037056, 168, 16384]
>> btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 21037056 parent 0 root 3  owner 1 offset 0
>> Failed to find [21053440, 168, 16384]
>> btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 21053440 parent 0 root 3  owner 0 offset 1
>> Failed to find [21299200, 168, 16384]
>> btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 21299200 parent 0 root 3  owner 0 offset 1
>> Failed to find [5523931971584, 168, 16384]
>> btrfs unable to find ref byte nr 5524037566464 parent 0 root 3861  owner 3 offset 0
>> ctree.c:197: update_ref_for_cow: BUG_ON `ret` triggered, value -5
>> btrfs(+0x113cf)[0x5651e60443cf]
>> btrfs(__btrfs_cow_block+0x576)[0x5651e6045848]
>> btrfs(btrfs_cow_block+0xea)[0x5651e6045dc6]
>> btrfs(btrfs_search_slot+0x11df)[0x5651e604969d]
>> btrfs(+0x59184)[0x5651e608c184]
>> btrfs(cmd_check+0x2bd4)[0x5651e60987b3]
>> btrfs(main+0x85)[0x5651e60442c3]
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf1)[0x7f34f523d2b1]
>> btrfs(_start+0x2a)[0x5651e6043e3a]
>
>Mmmh, never mind, it seems that the software raid suffered yet another
>double disk failure due to some undermined flakiness in the underlying block
>device cabling :-/
>That would likely explain the failures here.

I'm sorry for hear this. Which raid level are you using? So could you recover
from this double disk failure?

-- 
Thanks,
Lu