From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, josef@toxicpanda.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: fix readdir deadlock with pagefault
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:01:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170724140121.GB9406@destiny> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170724131408.GT2866@twin.jikos.cz>
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 03:14:08PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:50:50PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 01:29:08PM -0400, josef@toxicpanda.com wrote:
> > > From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
> > >
> > > Readdir does dir_emit while under the btree lock. dir_emit can trigger
> > > the page fault which means we can deadlock. Fix this by allocating a
> > > buffer on opening a directory and copying the readdir into this buffer
> > > and doing dir_emit from outside of the tree lock.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/btrfs/inode.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> > > index 9a4413a..61396e3 100644
> > > --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> > > @@ -5877,6 +5877,56 @@ unsigned char btrfs_filetype_table[] = {
> > > DT_UNKNOWN, DT_REG, DT_DIR, DT_CHR, DT_BLK, DT_FIFO, DT_SOCK, DT_LNK
> > > };
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * All this infrastructure exists because dir_emit can fault, and we are holding
> > > + * the tree lock when doing readdir. For now just allocate a buffer and copy
> > > + * our information into that, and then dir_emit from the buffer. This is
> > > + * similar to what NFS does, only we don't keep the buffer around in pagecache
> > > + * because I'm afraid I'll fuck that up.
>
> Can you please explain the concern in more detail?
>
If we keep the cache I'll have to have mechanisms to invalidate the page cache
so it can be regenerated at the next readdir. Then I also have to wire up
releasepage and stuff for directories and make sure it doesn't do anything
bonkers like accidently try to write the data out for a directory. All in all
it's not worth the headache I don't think. Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-24 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-21 17:29 [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: don't allow trans ioctl on a directory josef
2017-07-21 17:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: fix readdir deadlock with pagefault josef
2017-07-21 19:10 ` Josef Bacik
2017-07-24 8:26 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-07-24 13:59 ` Josef Bacik
2017-07-24 12:50 ` David Sterba
2017-07-24 13:14 ` David Sterba
2017-07-24 14:01 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2017-07-21 17:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: increase ctx->pos for delayed dir index josef
2017-07-24 12:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: don't allow trans ioctl on a directory David Sterba
2017-07-24 12:58 ` David Sterba
2017-07-24 14:02 ` Josef Bacik
2017-07-24 16:02 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170724140121.GB9406@destiny \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).