From: jeffm@suse.com
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] btrfs-progs: backref: use separate list for missing keys
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:51:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170725205138.28376-6-jeffm@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170725205138.28376-1-jeffm@suse.com>
From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Rather than iterate over all outstanding backrefs to resolve missing keys,
use a separate list that only contains refs that need missing keys resolved.
Once the missing key is resolved, move the ref to the pending list.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
---
backref.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/backref.c b/backref.c
index be3376a..1d670ee 100644
--- a/backref.c
+++ b/backref.c
@@ -137,11 +137,13 @@ static struct __prelim_ref *list_first_pref(struct list_head *head)
struct pref_state {
struct list_head pending;
+ struct list_head pending_missing_keys;
};
static void init_pref_state(struct pref_state *prefstate)
{
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&prefstate->pending);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&prefstate->pending_missing_keys);
}
/*
@@ -188,7 +190,7 @@ static int __add_prelim_ref(struct pref_state *prefstate, u64 root_id,
u64 parent, u64 wanted_disk_byte, int count,
gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
- struct list_head *head = &prefstate->pending;
+ struct list_head *head;
struct __prelim_ref *ref;
if (root_id == BTRFS_DATA_RELOC_TREE_OBJECTID)
@@ -199,16 +201,20 @@ static int __add_prelim_ref(struct pref_state *prefstate, u64 root_id,
return -ENOMEM;
ref->root_id = root_id;
- if (key)
+ if (key) {
ref->key_for_search = *key;
- else
+ head = &prefstate->pending;
+ } else {
memset(&ref->key_for_search, 0, sizeof(ref->key_for_search));
+ head = &prefstate->pending_missing_keys;
+ }
ref->inode_list = NULL;
ref->level = level;
ref->count = count;
ref->parent = parent;
ref->wanted_disk_byte = wanted_disk_byte;
+
list_add_tail(&ref->list, head);
return 0;
@@ -454,18 +460,15 @@ static inline int ref_for_same_block(struct __prelim_ref *ref1,
static int __add_missing_keys(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct pref_state *prefstate)
{
- struct list_head *head = &prefstate->pending;
- struct list_head *pos;
struct extent_buffer *eb;
- list_for_each(pos, head) {
+ while(!list_empty(&prefstate->pending_missing_keys)) {
struct __prelim_ref *ref;
- ref = list_entry(pos, struct __prelim_ref, list);
+ ref = list_first_pref(&prefstate->pending_missing_keys);
- if (ref->parent)
- continue;
- if (ref->key_for_search.type)
- continue;
+ ASSERT(ref->root_id);
+ ASSERT(!ref->parent);
+ ASSERT(ref->key_for_search.type);
BUG_ON(!ref->wanted_disk_byte);
eb = read_tree_block(fs_info->tree_root, ref->wanted_disk_byte,
fs_info->tree_root->nodesize, 0);
@@ -478,6 +481,7 @@ static int __add_missing_keys(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
else
btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(eb, &ref->key_for_search, 0);
free_extent_buffer(eb);
+ list_move(&ref->list, &prefstate->pending);
}
return 0;
}
@@ -808,6 +812,8 @@ static int find_parent_nodes(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
__merge_refs(&prefstate, 2);
+ BUG_ON(!list_empty(&prefstate.pending_missing_keys));
+
while (!list_empty(&prefstate.pending)) {
ref = list_first_pref(&prefstate.pending);
WARN_ON(ref->count < 0);
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-25 20:51 [PATCH 1/7] btrfs-progs: check: supplement extent backref list with rbtree jeffm
2017-07-25 20:51 ` [PATCH 2/7] btrfs-progs: check: switch to iterating over the backref_tree jeffm
2017-07-25 20:51 ` [PATCH 3/7] btrfs-progs: extent-cache: actually cache extent buffers jeffm
2017-07-26 7:00 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-07-26 13:21 ` Jeff Mahoney
2017-08-22 15:44 ` David Sterba
2017-07-25 20:51 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs-progs: backref: push state tracking into a helper structure jeffm
2017-07-25 20:51 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs-progs: backref: add list_first_pref helper jeffm
2017-07-26 7:08 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-07-26 13:22 ` Jeff Mahoney
2017-07-26 13:25 ` Jeff Mahoney
2017-07-25 20:51 ` jeffm [this message]
2017-07-25 20:51 ` [PATCH 7/7] btrfs-progs: backref: use separate list for indirect refs jeffm
2017-09-29 17:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] btrfs-progs: check: supplement extent backref list with rbtree David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170725205138.28376-6-jeffm@suse.com \
--to=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).