linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulli Horlacher <framstag@rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
To: Linux fs Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: netapp-alike snapshots?
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 22:48:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170822204811.GO14804@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22940.31139.194399.982315@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk>

On Tue 2017-08-22 (19:36), Peter Grandi wrote:

> Indeed and there is a fair description of some options for
> subvolume nesting policies here which may be interesting to the
> original poster:
> 
>   https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/SysadminGuide#Layout
> 
> It is unsurprising to me that there are tradeoffs involved in
> every choice. I find the "Flat" layout particularly desirable.

My layout is already nearly "flat".
It seems my decision was right :-)



> Btrfs snapshots can only be done for a whole subvolume.

I know this.

> Subvolumes and snapshots can be created by users, but too many snapshots
> (see below) can cause trouble. For somewhat good reasons subvolumes
> including snapshots cannot be deleted by users though unless mount option
> 'user_subvol_rm_allowed' is used.

Ooops, this is new to me!

framstag@fex:~: btrfs subvolume create xx
Create subvolume './xx'

framstag@fex:~: btrfs subvolume delete xx
Delete subvolume '/local/home/framstag/xx'
ERROR: cannot delete '/local/home/framstag/xx' - Operation not permitted

This means, root has to remove the subvolme.
Is it possible to disallow creation of subvolumes for normal users?



> >>> Because Netapp do it this way - for at least 20 years and we
> >>> have a multi-PB Netapp storage environment. No chance to change
> >>> this.
> 
> Send patches :-).

For waffle or btrfs? :-)


> Assumptions that all Btrfs features such as snapshots are
> infinitely scalable at no cost may be optimistic:
> 
>   https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Gotchas#Having_many_subvolumes_can_be_very_slow

"when you do device removes on file systems with a lot of snapshots, it
 is unbelievably slow ... took nearly a week to move 20GB of FS data from
 one device to the other using that method"
  
"a balance on 2TB of data that was heavily snapshotted - it took 3 months" 

ARGH!!
Thanks for this warning!
I will overthink my multi-snapshots plan!

-- 
Ullrich Horlacher              Server und Virtualisierung
Rechenzentrum TIK         
Universitaet Stuttgart         E-Mail: horlacher@tik.uni-stuttgart.de
Allmandring 30a                Tel:    ++49-711-68565868
70569 Stuttgart (Germany)      WWW:    http://www.tik.uni-stuttgart.de/
REF:<22940.31139.194399.982315@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-22 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-22 13:22 netapp-alike snapshots? Ulli Horlacher
2017-08-22 13:44 ` Peter Becker
2017-08-22 14:24   ` Ulli Horlacher
2017-08-22 16:08     ` Peter Becker
2017-08-22 16:48       ` Ulli Horlacher
2017-08-22 16:45     ` Roman Mamedov
2017-08-22 16:57       ` Ulli Horlacher
2017-08-22 17:19         ` A L
2017-08-22 18:01           ` Ulli Horlacher
2017-08-22 18:36             ` Peter Grandi
2017-08-22 20:48               ` Ulli Horlacher [this message]
2017-08-23  7:18                 ` number of subvolumes Ulli Horlacher
2017-08-23  8:37                   ` A L
2017-08-23 16:48                     ` Ferry Toth
2017-08-24 17:45                       ` Peter Grandi
2017-08-31  6:49                         ` Ulli Horlacher
2017-08-31 11:18                           ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-08-31 14:38                             ` Michał Sokołowski
2017-08-31 16:18                               ` Duncan
2017-09-01 10:21                                 ` ein
2017-09-01 11:47                                   ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-08-24 19:40                       ` Marat Khalili
2017-08-24 21:56                         ` Ferry Toth
2017-08-25  5:54                           ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-25 11:45                           ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-08-25 12:55                             ` Ferry Toth
2017-08-25 19:18                               ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-08-23 12:11                   ` Peter Grandi
2017-08-22 21:53               ` user snapshots Ulli Horlacher
2017-08-23  6:28                 ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov
2017-08-23  7:16                   ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov
2017-08-23  7:20                     ` Ulli Horlacher
2017-08-23 11:42                       ` Peter Grandi
2017-08-23 21:13                         ` Ulli Horlacher
2017-08-25 11:28                           ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-08-22 17:36         ` netapp-alike snapshots? Roman Mamedov
2017-08-22 18:10           ` Ulli Horlacher
2017-09-09 13:26 ` Ulli Horlacher
2017-09-09 13:36   ` Marc MERLIN
2017-09-09 13:44     ` Ulli Horlacher
2017-09-09 19:43       ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-09-09 19:52         ` Ulli Horlacher
2017-09-10  7:10           ` A L
2017-09-10 14:54         ` Marc MERLIN

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170822204811.GO14804@rus.uni-stuttgart.de \
    --to=framstag@rus.uni-stuttgart.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).