From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: Add sanity check for EXTENT_DATA when reading out leaf
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 16:57:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170823075759.13982-4-quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170823075759.13982-1-quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Add extra checker for item with EXTENT_DATA type.
This checks the following thing:
0) Key offset
All key offset must be aligned to sectorsize.
Inline extent must have 0 for key offset.
1) Item size
Plain text inline file extent size must match item size.
(compressed inline file extent has no info about its on-disk size)
Regular/preallocated file extent size must be a fixed value.
2) Every member of regular file extent item
Including alignment for bytenr and offset, possible value for
compression/encryption/type.
3) Type/compression/encode must be one of the valid values.
This should be the most comprehensive and restrict check in the context
of btrfs_item for EXTENT_DATA.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index e034d08bd036..b92296c6a698 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -549,6 +549,103 @@ static int check_tree_block_fsid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
btrfs_header_level(eb) == 0 ? "leaf" : "node", \
reason, btrfs_header_bytenr(eb), root->objectid, slot)
+static int check_extent_data_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
+ struct extent_buffer *leaf,
+ struct btrfs_key *key, int slot)
+{
+ struct btrfs_file_extent_item *fi;
+ u32 sectorsize = root->fs_info->sectorsize;
+ u32 item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot);
+
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(key->offset, sectorsize)) {
+ CORRUPT("unaligned key offset for file extent",
+ leaf, root, slot);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+ }
+
+ fi = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
+
+ if (btrfs_file_extent_type(leaf, fi) >= BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_LAST_TYPE) {
+ CORRUPT("invalid file extent type", leaf, root, slot);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Support for new compression/encrption must introduce incompat flag,
+ * and must be caught in open_ctree().
+ */
+ if (btrfs_file_extent_compression(leaf, fi) >= BTRFS_COMPRESS_LAST) {
+ CORRUPT("invalid file extent compression", leaf, root, slot);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+ }
+ if (btrfs_file_extent_encryption(leaf, fi)) {
+ CORRUPT("invalid file extent encryption", leaf, root, slot);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+ }
+ if (btrfs_file_extent_type(leaf, fi) == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
+ /* Inline extent must have 0 as key offset */
+ if (key->offset) {
+ CORRUPT("inline extent has non-zero key offset",
+ leaf, root, slot);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+ }
+
+ /* Compressed inline extent has no on-disk size, skip it */
+ if (btrfs_file_extent_compression(leaf, fi) !=
+ BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Plaintext inline extent size must match item size */
+ if (item_size != BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE_DATA_START +
+ btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(leaf, fi)) {
+ CORRUPT("plaintext inline extent has invalid size",
+ leaf, root, slot);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+ }
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+
+ /* regular or preallocated extent has fixed item size */
+ if (item_size != sizeof(*fi)) {
+ CORRUPT(
+ "regluar or preallocated extent data item size is invalid",
+ leaf, root, slot);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+ }
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(leaf, fi), sectorsize) ||
+ !IS_ALIGNED(btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(leaf, fi), sectorsize) ||
+ !IS_ALIGNED(btrfs_file_extent_disk_num_bytes(leaf, fi),
+ sectorsize) ||
+ !IS_ALIGNED(btrfs_file_extent_offset(leaf, fi), sectorsize) ||
+ !IS_ALIGNED(btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(leaf, fi), sectorsize)) {
+ CORRUPT(
+ "regular or preallocated extent data item has unaligned value",
+ leaf, root, slot);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int check_leaf_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
+ struct extent_buffer *leaf,
+ struct btrfs_key *key, int slot)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Considering how overcrowded the code will be inside the switch,
+ * complex verification is better to moved its own function.
+ */
+ switch (key->type) {
+ case BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY:
+ ret = check_extent_data_item(root, leaf, key, slot);
+ break;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
static noinline int check_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root,
struct extent_buffer *leaf)
{
@@ -605,9 +702,13 @@ static noinline int check_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root,
* 1) key order
* 2) item offset and size
* No overlap, no hole, all inside the leaf.
+ * 3) item content
+ * If possible, do comprehensive sanity check.
+ * NOTE: All check must only rely on the item data itself.
*/
for (slot = 0; slot < nritems; slot++) {
u32 item_end_expected;
+ int ret;
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, slot);
@@ -650,6 +751,13 @@ static noinline int check_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root,
return -EUCLEAN;
}
+ /*
+ * Check if the item size and content meets other limitation
+ */
+ ret = check_leaf_item(root, leaf, &key, slot);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
prev_key.objectid = key.objectid;
prev_key.type = key.type;
prev_key.offset = key.offset;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
index 10689e1fdf11..3aadbb74a024 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
@@ -732,6 +732,7 @@ struct btrfs_balance_item {
#define BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE 0
#define BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_REG 1
#define BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_PREALLOC 2
+#define BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_LAST_TYPE 3
struct btrfs_file_extent_item {
/*
--
2.14.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-23 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 7:57 [PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce comprehensive sanity check framework and Qu Wenruo
2017-08-23 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs: Refactor check_leaf function for later expansion Qu Wenruo
2017-08-23 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] btrfs: Check if item pointer overlap with item itself Qu Wenruo
2017-08-23 7:57 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2017-09-25 15:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: Add sanity check for EXTENT_DATA when reading out leaf David Sterba
2017-09-26 0:28 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-09-26 0:46 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-09-26 12:13 ` David Sterba
2017-09-26 12:49 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-09-26 14:42 ` David Sterba
2017-09-26 12:05 ` David Sterba
2017-09-26 12:42 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-08-23 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] btrfs: Add checker for EXTENT_CSUM Qu Wenruo
2017-08-23 15:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce comprehensive sanity check framework and Nikolay Borisov
2017-09-25 15:17 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170823075759.13982-4-quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).