* dead links in wiki about why not using lz4
@ 2017-09-12 9:19 Alberto Bursi
2017-09-12 9:33 ` Timofey Titovets
2017-09-12 11:58 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alberto Bursi @ 2017-09-12 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 575 bytes --]
Since zstd was added in btrfs there are people wondering why not lz4 too.
The wiki paragraph [1] cites a couple dead links as explanations on why
it's not a good idea to have lz4 in btrfs.
I think it would be nice if someone can write that information back in
the wiki, or for the very least write them in a mailing list message
that can be linked there.
-Alberto
1. https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Will_btrfs_support_LZ4.3F
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±ý»k~ÏâØ^nr¡ö¦zË\x1aëh¨èÚ&£ûàz¿äz¹Þú+Ê+zf£¢·h§~Ûiÿÿïêÿêçz_è®\x0fæj:+v¨þ)ߣøm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: dead links in wiki about why not using lz4
2017-09-12 9:19 dead links in wiki about why not using lz4 Alberto Bursi
@ 2017-09-12 9:33 ` Timofey Titovets
2017-09-12 11:55 ` David Sterba
2017-09-12 11:58 ` David Sterba
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Timofey Titovets @ 2017-09-12 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alberto Bursi; +Cc: linux-btrfs
2017-09-12 12:19 GMT+03:00 Alberto Bursi <alberto.bursi@outlook.it>:
> Since zstd was added in btrfs there are people wondering why not lz4 too.
>
> The wiki paragraph [1] cites a couple dead links as explanations on why
> it's not a good idea to have lz4 in btrfs.
>
> I think it would be nice if someone can write that information back in
> the wiki, or for the very least write them in a mailing list message
> that can be linked there.
>
>
> -Alberto
>
>
> 1. https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Will_btrfs_support_LZ4.3F
>
AFAIK Problem description:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=140181084426296&w=2
--
Have a nice day,
Timofey.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: dead links in wiki about why not using lz4
2017-09-12 9:33 ` Timofey Titovets
@ 2017-09-12 11:55 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2017-09-12 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Timofey Titovets; +Cc: Alberto Bursi, linux-btrfs
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:33:21PM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> 2017-09-12 12:19 GMT+03:00 Alberto Bursi <alberto.bursi@outlook.it>:
> > Since zstd was added in btrfs there are people wondering why not lz4 too.
> >
> > The wiki paragraph [1] cites a couple dead links as explanations on why
> > it's not a good idea to have lz4 in btrfs.
> >
> > I think it would be nice if someone can write that information back in
> > the wiki, or for the very least write them in a mailing list message
> > that can be linked there.
> >
> >
> > -Alberto
> >
> >
> > 1. https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Will_btrfs_support_LZ4.3F
> >
>
> AFAIK Problem description:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=140181084426296&w=2
Yeah that's the response. And the reason for not adding lz4 still
stands, there's no measurable benefit over lzo under the implementation
constraints we have in btrfs now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: dead links in wiki about why not using lz4
2017-09-12 9:19 dead links in wiki about why not using lz4 Alberto Bursi
2017-09-12 9:33 ` Timofey Titovets
@ 2017-09-12 11:58 ` David Sterba
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2017-09-12 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alberto Bursi; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:19:14AM +0000, Alberto Bursi wrote:
> Since zstd was added in btrfs there are people wondering why not lz4 too.
>
> The wiki paragraph [1] cites a couple dead links as explanations on why
> it's not a good idea to have lz4 in btrfs.
Regarding dead links, there's no replacement for the web interface of
gmane.org, so there are now many left.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-12 11:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-12 9:19 dead links in wiki about why not using lz4 Alberto Bursi
2017-09-12 9:33 ` Timofey Titovets
2017-09-12 11:55 ` David Sterba
2017-09-12 11:58 ` David Sterba
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).