From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp01.belwue.de ([129.143.71.86]:35334 "EHLO smtp01.belwue.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750879AbdIOKBF (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:01:05 -0400 Received: from fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.1.129]) by smtp01.belwue.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 9ABB381D9 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:01:03 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:01:03 +0200 From: Ulli Horlacher To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: snapshots of encrypted directories? Message-ID: <20170915100103.GB32347@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> References: <20170914145739.GA32347@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <20170914153222.GC7067@carfax.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri 2017-09-15 (06:45), Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > The actual question is - do you need to mount each individual btrfs > subvolume when using encfs? And even worse it goes with ecryptfs: I do not know at all how to mount a snapshot, so that the user has access to it. It seems snapshots are incompatible with encrypted filesystems :-( -- Ullrich Horlacher Server und Virtualisierung Rechenzentrum TIK Universitaet Stuttgart E-Mail: horlacher@tik.uni-stuttgart.de Allmandring 30a Tel: ++49-711-68565868 70569 Stuttgart (Germany) WWW: http://www.tik.uni-stuttgart.de/ REF: