linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.cz, rich@shroop.net,
	rrauenza@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Remove WARN_ON for unaligned device created before v4.13 and adds more user friendly output
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:50:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171019175023.GP3521@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef36c960-d313-84ee-0bf7-fe716b0f73f9@gmx.com>

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 03:22:36PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> >>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> >>> @@ -6472,15 +6472,23 @@ static int read_one_chunk(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct btrfs_key *key,
> >>>   	return 0;
> >>>   }
> >>>   
> >>> -static void fill_device_from_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
> >>> -				 struct btrfs_dev_item *dev_item,
> >>> -				 struct btrfs_device *device)
> >>> +static void fill_device_from_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >>> +				  struct extent_buffer *leaf,
> >>> +				  struct btrfs_dev_item *dev_item,
> >>> +				  struct btrfs_device *device)
> >>>   {
> >>>   	unsigned long ptr;
> >>>   
> >>>   	device->devid = btrfs_device_id(leaf, dev_item);
> >>>   	device->disk_total_bytes = btrfs_device_total_bytes(leaf, dev_item);
> >>>   	device->total_bytes = device->disk_total_bytes;
> >>> +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(device->total_bytes, fs_info->sectorsize)) {
> >>> +		btrfs_warn(fs_info,
> >>> +			   "devid %llu has unaligned total bytes %llu",
> >>> +			   device->devid, device->disk_total_bytes);
> >>> +		btrfs_warn(fs_info,
> >>> +			   "please shrink the device a little and resize back to fix it");
> >>> +	}
> >>
> >> How about telling uses to know device->total_bytes should be alligned
> >> to fs_info->sectorsize here?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> > 
> > I should make my comment clearer, sorry.
> > 
> > ===
> > +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(device->total_bytes, fs_info->sectorsize)) {
> > +		btrfs_warn(fs_info,
> > +			   "devid %llu: total bytes %llu should be aligned to %u bytes",
> > +			   device->devid, device->disk_total_bytes, fs_info->sectorsize);
> > +		btrfs_warn(fs_info,
> > +			   "please shrink the device a little and resize back to fix it");
> > +	}
> > ===
> 
> That's better.
> 
> But I'm also considering modifying the total_bytes directly here.

Yeah, I think it would be better to fix here, without a warning even.
The rounding error is below 4k and nodesize, we would never use this
space for block groups so no accidental data loss.

> So that any time DEV_ITEM and super block get updated, new aligned value 
> will be written back to disk, and since the value is aligned in memory, 
> it won't cause WARN_ON() any longer.
> 
> I'll test and check the code for confirmation before updating the patch.

      reply	other threads:[~2017-10-19 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-20  6:18 [PATCH] btrfs: Remove WARN_ON for unaligned device created before v4.13 and adds more user friendly output Qu Wenruo
2017-09-23  1:19 ` Satoru Takeuchi
2017-09-23  1:27   ` Satoru Takeuchi
2017-09-23  7:22     ` Qu Wenruo
2017-10-19 17:50       ` David Sterba [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171019175023.GP3521@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=rich@shroop.net \
    --cc=rrauenza@gmail.com \
    --cc=satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).