From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fenrir.routify.me ([155.94.238.126]:44952 "EHLO fenrir.routify.me" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751590AbdKAHwy (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2017 03:52:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 00:43:38 -0700 From: Sean Greenslade To: Dave Cc: Linux fs Btrfs Subject: Re: defragmenting best practice? Message-ID: <20171101074338.GA32211@coach> References: <20170914172434.39eae89d@jupiter.sol.kaishome.de> <59BBB15E.8010002@sarach.com.pl> <59BBDFA6.4020500@sarach.com.pl> <20170915190826.1f0be8a9@jupiter.sol.kaishome.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 05:47:54PM -0400, Dave wrote: > I'm following up on all the suggestions regarding Firefox performance > on BTRFS. > > > > 5. Firefox profile sync has not worked well for us in the past, so we > don't use it. > 6. Our machines generally have plenty of RAM so we could put the > Firefox cache (and maybe profile) into RAM using a technique such as > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Firefox/Profile_on_RAM. However, > profile persistence is important. > 4. Put the Firefox cache in RAM > > 5. If needed, consider putting the Firefox profile in RAM Have you looked into profile-sync-daemon? https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/profile-sync-daemon It basically does the "keep the profile in RAM but also sync it to HDD" for you. I've used it for years, it works quite well. --Sean