linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: Dave <davestechshop@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux fs Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Need help with incremental backup strategy (snapshots, defragmentingt & performance)
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 10:15:10 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171101101510.218eeead@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH=dxU5mGQ5ws11fFKC+X3F810MceMxNBwnCR=g=Rau9DLDRng@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 01:00:08 -0400
Dave <davestechshop@gmail.com> wrote:

> To reconcile those conflicting goals, the only idea I have come up
> with so far is to use btrfs send-receive to perform incremental
> backups as described here:
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Incremental_Backup .

Another option is to just use the regular rsync to a designated destination
subvolume on the backup host, AND snapshot that subvolume on that host from
time to time (or on backup completions, if you can synchronize that).

rsync --inplace will keep space usage low as it will not reupload entire files
in case of changes/additions to them.

Yes rsync has to traverse both directory trees to find changes, but that's
pretty fast (couple of minutes at most, for a typical root filesystem),
especially if you use SSD or SSD caching.

-- 
With respect,
Roman

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-01  5:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-01  5:00 Need help with incremental backup strategy (snapshots, defragmentingt & performance) Dave
2017-11-01  5:15 ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2017-11-01  6:27   ` Dave
2017-11-14  3:39   ` Dave
2017-11-14  7:14     ` Marat Khalili
2017-11-14  8:21       ` Roman Mamedov
2017-11-14  8:50     ` Roman Mamedov
2017-11-14 20:51       ` Dave
2017-11-16 16:10         ` Kai Krakow
2017-11-16 16:13         ` Kai Krakow
2017-11-17  3:51           ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-11-17 22:36             ` Kai Krakow
2017-11-01  6:19 ` Marat Khalili
2017-11-01  6:51   ` Dave
2017-11-01  8:34     ` Marat Khalili
2017-11-01 20:27       ` Dave
2017-11-02  0:35         ` Peter Grandi
2017-11-02 20:46     ` Kai Krakow
2017-11-03  3:24       ` Dave
2017-11-03  7:06         ` Kai Krakow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171101101510.218eeead@natsu \
    --to=rm@romanrm.net \
    --cc=davestechshop@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).