Re: btrfs check: add_missing_dir_index: BUG_ON `ret` triggered, value -17

[Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 08:16:32AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >         item 27 key (1919785864 DIR_ITEM 2591417872) itemoff 14637 itemsize 46
> >                 location key (1919805647 INODE_ITEM 0) type FILE
> >                 transid 2231988 data_len 0 name_len 16
> >                 name: 1955-capture.jpg
> 
> OK, this DIR_ITEM matches with INODE_REF.
> So btrfs-check should only need to insert DIR_INDEX for it.
> > 
> >> Although what we could try is to avoid BUG_ON(), but I'm afraid the
> >> problem is more severe than my expectation.
> >  
> > How does it look now?
> 
> At least we know what btrfs check should do.
> I could dig it a little deeper to see if we could fix it.
> (Or something strange happened again)

Thanks for having had a look, hopefully it helps improving btrfs check,
thanks for getting the info and getting it turned into better code :)

In the meantime this was an easy FS to just wipe and start over with, so
I just did that.

Marc
-- 
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
                                      .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/                         | PGP 1024R/763BE901