linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix inlined data extent ref lookup
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:03:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171122090325.29458-4-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171122090325.29458-1-wqu@suse.com>

When lowmem fsck tries to find backref of a specified file extent, it
searches inlined data ref first.

However, extent data ref contains both owner root objectid, inode number
and calculated offset (file offset - extent offset).

The code only checks owner root objectid, not checking inode number nor
calculated offset.

This makes lowmem mode fails to detect any backref mismatch if there is
a inlined data ref with the same owner objectid.

Fix it by also checking extent data ref's objectid and offset.

Fixes: b0d360b541f0 ("btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check data backref in extent tree")
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <chris@colorremedies.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
 cmds-check.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c
index 03ff89a4221c..9f9eb504ae8e 100644
--- a/cmds-check.c
+++ b/cmds-check.c
@@ -12005,11 +12005,11 @@ static int check_extent_data_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
 	u64 disk_num_bytes;
 	u64 extent_num_bytes;
 	u64 extent_flags;
+	u64 offset;
 	u32 item_size;
 	unsigned long end;
 	unsigned long ptr;
 	int type;
-	u64 ref_root;
 	int found_dbackref = 0;
 	int slot = pathp->slots[0];
 	int err = 0;
@@ -12027,6 +12027,7 @@ static int check_extent_data_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
 	disk_bytenr = btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(eb, fi);
 	disk_num_bytes = btrfs_file_extent_disk_num_bytes(eb, fi);
 	extent_num_bytes = btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(eb, fi);
+	offset = btrfs_file_extent_offset(eb, fi);
 
 	/* Check unaligned disk_num_bytes and num_bytes */
 	if (!IS_ALIGNED(disk_num_bytes, root->fs_info->sectorsize)) {
@@ -12081,6 +12082,11 @@ static int check_extent_data_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
 	strict = should_check_extent_strictly(root, nrefs, -1);
 
 	while (ptr < end) {
+		u64 ref_root;
+		u64 ref_objectid;
+		u64 ref_offset;
+		bool match = false;
+
 		iref = (struct btrfs_extent_inline_ref *)ptr;
 		type = btrfs_extent_inline_ref_type(leaf, iref);
 		dref = (struct btrfs_extent_data_ref *)(&iref->offset);
@@ -12092,9 +12098,15 @@ static int check_extent_data_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
 		}
 		if (type == BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_REF_KEY) {
 			ref_root = btrfs_extent_data_ref_root(leaf, dref);
-			if (ref_root == root->objectid)
+			ref_objectid = btrfs_extent_data_ref_objectid(leaf, dref);
+			ref_offset = btrfs_extent_data_ref_offset(leaf, dref);
+
+			if (ref_objectid == fi_key.objectid &&
+			    ref_offset == fi_key.offset - offset)
+				match = true;
+			if (ref_root == root->objectid && match)
 				found_dbackref = 1;
-			else if (!strict && owner == ref_root)
+			else if (!strict && owner == ref_root && match)
 				found_dbackref = 1;
 		} else if (type == BTRFS_SHARED_DATA_REF_KEY) {
 			found_dbackref = !check_tree_block_ref(root, NULL,
-- 
2.15.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-22  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-22  9:03 [PATCH 00/11] Lowmem mode btrfs fixes exposed by complex tree Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22  9:03 ` [PATCH 01/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix regression which screws up extent allocator Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22  9:03 ` [PATCH 02/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix NULL pointer access caused by large tree reloc tree Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22  9:03 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2017-11-22  9:03 ` [PATCH 04/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix false backref lost warning for keyed extent data ref Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22  9:03 ` [PATCH 05/11] btrfs-progs: fsck-test: Introduce test case for false data extent backref lost Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22  9:03 ` [PATCH 06/11] btrfs-progs: backref: Allow backref walk to handle direct parent ref Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22  9:03 ` [PATCH 07/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix function call stack overflow caused by wrong tree reloc tree detection Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22  9:03 ` [PATCH 08/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix false alerts for image with shared block ref only backref Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22  9:03 ` [PATCH 10/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix false alerts of referencer count mismatch for snapshot Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22  9:03 ` [PATCH 11/11] btrfs-progs: fsck-tests: Introduce test case with keyed data backref with shared tree blocks Qu Wenruo
2017-11-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 00/11] Lowmem mode btrfs fixes exposed by complex tree David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171122090325.29458-4-wqu@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).