From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz
Subject: [PATCH 08/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix false alerts for image with shared block ref only backref
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:03:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171122090325.29458-9-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171122090325.29458-1-wqu@suse.com>
[BUG]
For image with shared block ref only metadata item like:
------
item 66 key (21573632 METADATA_ITEM 0) itemoff 3971 itemsize 24
refs 66 gen 9 flags TREE_BLOCK|FULL_BACKREF
tree block skinny level 0
item 0 key (21573632 SHARED_BLOCK_REF 21676032) itemoff 3995 itemsize 0
shared block backref
item 1 key (21573632 SHARED_BLOCK_REF 21921792) itemoff 3995 itemsize 0
shared block backref
item 2 key (21573632 SHARED_BLOCK_REF 21995520) itemoff 3995 itemsize 0
shared block backref
item 3 key (21573632 SHARED_BLOCK_REF 22077440) itemoff 3995 itemsize 0
shared block backref
...
------
Lowmem mode check will report false alerts like:
------
ERROR: extent[21573632 4096] backref lost (owner: 256, level: 0)
------
[CAUSE]
In fact, the false alerts is not even from extent tree verfication, but
a fs tree helper which is designed to make sure there is some tree block
referring to the fs tree block.
The idea is to find inlined tree backref then keyed TREE_BLOCK_REF_KEY.
However it missed SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY, and caused such false alert.
[FIX]
Add SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY to make the warning shut up.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
cmds-check.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c
index 7eb08b6cb962..791fab6b3e6a 100644
--- a/cmds-check.c
+++ b/cmds-check.c
@@ -11850,6 +11850,30 @@ static int check_tree_block_ref(struct btrfs_root *root,
if (!ret)
found_ref = 1;
}
+ /*
+ * Finally check SHARED BLOCK REF, any found will be good
+ * Here we're not doing comprehensive extent backref checking,
+ * only need to ensure there is some extent referring to this
+ * tree block.
+ */
+ if (!found_ref) {
+ btrfs_release_path(&path);
+ key.objectid = bytenr;
+ key.type = BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY;
+ key.offset = (u64)-1;
+
+ ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, extent_root, &key, &path, 0, 0);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ err |= BACKREF_MISSING;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ ret = btrfs_previous_extent_item(extent_root, &path, bytenr);
+ if (ret) {
+ err |= BACKREF_MISSING;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ found_ref = 1;
+ }
if (!found_ref)
err |= BACKREF_MISSING;
out:
--
2.15.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-22 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-22 9:03 [PATCH 00/11] Lowmem mode btrfs fixes exposed by complex tree Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22 9:03 ` [PATCH 01/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix regression which screws up extent allocator Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22 9:03 ` [PATCH 02/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix NULL pointer access caused by large tree reloc tree Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22 9:03 ` [PATCH 03/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix inlined data extent ref lookup Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22 9:03 ` [PATCH 04/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix false backref lost warning for keyed extent data ref Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22 9:03 ` [PATCH 05/11] btrfs-progs: fsck-test: Introduce test case for false data extent backref lost Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22 9:03 ` [PATCH 06/11] btrfs-progs: backref: Allow backref walk to handle direct parent ref Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22 9:03 ` [PATCH 07/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix function call stack overflow caused by wrong tree reloc tree detection Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22 9:03 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2017-11-22 9:03 ` [PATCH 10/11] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix false alerts of referencer count mismatch for snapshot Qu Wenruo
2017-11-22 9:03 ` [PATCH 11/11] btrfs-progs: fsck-tests: Introduce test case with keyed data backref with shared tree blocks Qu Wenruo
2017-11-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 00/11] Lowmem mode btrfs fixes exposed by complex tree David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171122090325.29458-9-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).