From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-f178.google.com ([209.85.216.178]:38131 "EHLO mail-qt0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932248AbdK2RFF (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:05:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:05:01 -0800 From: Tejun Heo To: Jan Kara Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, clm@fb.com, jbacik@fb.com, kernel-team@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2] cgroup, writeback, btrfs: make sure btrfs issues metadata IOs from the root cgroup Message-ID: <20171129170501.GW983427@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> References: <20171010155441.753966-1-tj@kernel.org> <20171129165608.GA26740@quack2.suse.cz> <20171129170330.GV983427@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20171129170330.GV983427@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:03:30AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:56:08PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > What has happened with this patch set? > > No idea. cc'ing Chris directly. Chris, if the patchset looks good, > can you please route them through the btrfs tree? lol looking at the patchset again, I'm not sure that's obviously the right tree. It can either be cgroup, block or btrfs. If no one objects, I'll just route them through cgroup. Thanks. -- tejun