linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] btrfs: add function to device list delete
Date: Tue,  5 Dec 2017 16:52:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171205085258.4038-2-anand.jain@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171205085258.4038-1-anand.jain@oracle.com>

We need device delete from the dev_list so create a new function.
New instead of refactor of btrfs_free_stale_device() because,
btrfs_free_stale_device() doesn't hold device_list_mutex which
is actually needed here.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
v1: title of this patch
  btrfs: refactor btrfs_free_stale_device() to get device list delete
v2:
 delete_device_from_list() is not pealed from btrfs_free_stale_device()
 as this needs device_list_mutex. And its static now.
v3: Send to correct ML
v4: no change

 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 04164337ac69..5deda80316f0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -531,6 +531,28 @@ static void pending_bios_fn(struct btrfs_work *work)
 	run_scheduled_bios(device);
 }
 
+static void delete_device_from_list(struct btrfs_device *device)
+{
+	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
+
+	fs_devices = device->fs_devices;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
+
+	mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
+	fs_devices->num_devices--;
+	list_del(&device->dev_list);
+	mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
+
+	rcu_string_free(device->name);
+	kfree(device);
+
+	if (fs_devices->num_devices == 0) {
+		btrfs_sysfs_remove_fsid(fs_devices);
+		list_del(&fs_devices->list);
+		free_fs_devices(fs_devices);
+	}
+}
 
 static void btrfs_free_stale_device(struct btrfs_device *cur_dev)
 {
-- 
2.7.0


  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-05  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-05  8:52 [PATCH v4 0/2] Add cli and ioctl to ignore a scanned device Anand Jain
2017-12-05  8:52 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2017-12-05 19:06   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] btrfs: add function to device list delete David Sterba
2017-12-05 21:30     ` Anand Jain
2017-12-05  8:52 ` [PATCH v4] btrfs-progs: add 'btrfs device ignore' cli Anand Jain
2017-12-05 19:11   ` David Sterba
2017-12-06  7:26     ` Anand Jain
2017-12-05  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] btrfs: introduce feature to ignore a btrfs device Anand Jain
2017-12-05 19:24   ` David Sterba
2017-12-06  7:55     ` Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171205085258.4038-2-anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).