From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: btrfs_dedupe_file_range() ioctl, remove 16MiB restriction
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:23:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171219212333.GA11950@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171219100247.13880-2-nefelim4ag@gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 01:02:44PM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> At now btrfs_dedupe_file_range() restricted to 16MiB range for
> limit locking time and memory requirement for dedup ioctl()
>
> For too big input range code silently set range to 16MiB
>
> Let's remove that restriction by do iterating over dedup range.
> That's backward compatible and will not change anything for request
> less then 16MiB.
>
> Changes:
> v1 -> v2:
> - Refactor btrfs_cmp_data_prepare and btrfs_extent_same
> - Store memory of pages array between iterations
> - Lock inodes once, not on each iteration
> - Small inplace cleanups
/me wonders if you could take advantage of vfs_clone_file_prep_inodes,
which takes care of the content comparison (and flushing files, and inode
checks, etc.) ?
(ISTR Qu Wenruo(??) or someone remarking that this might not work well
with btrfs locking model, but I could be mistaken about all that...)
--D
>
> Signed-off-by: Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index be5bd81b3669..45a47d0891fc 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -2965,8 +2965,8 @@ static void btrfs_cmp_data_free(struct cmp_pages *cmp)
> put_page(pg);
> }
> }
> - kfree(cmp->src_pages);
> - kfree(cmp->dst_pages);
> +
> + cmp->num_pages = 0;
> }
>
> static int btrfs_cmp_data_prepare(struct inode *src, u64 loff,
> @@ -2974,41 +2974,22 @@ static int btrfs_cmp_data_prepare(struct inode *src, u64 loff,
> u64 len, struct cmp_pages *cmp)
> {
> int ret;
> - int num_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(len) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> - struct page **src_pgarr, **dst_pgarr;
> -
> - /*
> - * We must gather up all the pages before we initiate our
> - * extent locking. We use an array for the page pointers. Size
> - * of the array is bounded by len, which is in turn bounded by
> - * BTRFS_MAX_DEDUPE_LEN.
> - */
> - src_pgarr = kcalloc(num_pages, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
> - dst_pgarr = kcalloc(num_pages, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!src_pgarr || !dst_pgarr) {
> - kfree(src_pgarr);
> - kfree(dst_pgarr);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> - cmp->num_pages = num_pages;
> - cmp->src_pages = src_pgarr;
> - cmp->dst_pages = dst_pgarr;
>
> /*
> * If deduping ranges in the same inode, locking rules make it mandatory
> * to always lock pages in ascending order to avoid deadlocks with
> * concurrent tasks (such as starting writeback/delalloc).
> */
> - if (src == dst && dst_loff < loff) {
> - swap(src_pgarr, dst_pgarr);
> + if (src == dst && dst_loff < loff)
> swap(loff, dst_loff);
> - }
>
> - ret = gather_extent_pages(src, src_pgarr, cmp->num_pages, loff);
> + cmp->num_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(len) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + ret = gather_extent_pages(src, cmp->src_pages, cmp->num_pages, loff);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> - ret = gather_extent_pages(dst, dst_pgarr, cmp->num_pages, dst_loff);
> + ret = gather_extent_pages(dst, cmp->dst_pages, cmp->num_pages, dst_loff);
>
> out:
> if (ret)
> @@ -3078,31 +3059,23 @@ static int extent_same_check_offsets(struct inode *inode, u64 off, u64 *plen,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
> - struct inode *dst, u64 dst_loff)
> +static int __btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
> + struct inode *dst, u64 dst_loff,
> + struct cmp_pages *cmp)
> {
> int ret;
> u64 len = olen;
> - struct cmp_pages cmp;
> bool same_inode = (src == dst);
> u64 same_lock_start = 0;
> u64 same_lock_len = 0;
>
> - if (len == 0)
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (same_inode)
> - inode_lock(src);
> - else
> - btrfs_double_inode_lock(src, dst);
> -
> ret = extent_same_check_offsets(src, loff, &len, olen);
> if (ret)
> - goto out_unlock;
> + return ret;
>
> ret = extent_same_check_offsets(dst, dst_loff, &len, olen);
> if (ret)
> - goto out_unlock;
> + return ret;
>
> if (same_inode) {
> /*
> @@ -3119,32 +3092,21 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
> * allow an unaligned length so long as it ends at
> * i_size.
> */
> - if (len != olen) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out_unlock;
> - }
> + if (len != olen)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> /* Check for overlapping ranges */
> - if (dst_loff + len > loff && dst_loff < loff + len) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out_unlock;
> - }
> + if (dst_loff + len > loff && dst_loff < loff + len)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> same_lock_start = min_t(u64, loff, dst_loff);
> same_lock_len = max_t(u64, loff, dst_loff) + len - same_lock_start;
> }
>
> - /* don't make the dst file partly checksummed */
> - if ((BTRFS_I(src)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM) !=
> - (BTRFS_I(dst)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM)) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out_unlock;
> - }
> -
> again:
> - ret = btrfs_cmp_data_prepare(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, olen, &cmp);
> + ret = btrfs_cmp_data_prepare(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, olen, cmp);
> if (ret)
> - goto out_unlock;
> + return ret;
>
> if (same_inode)
> ret = lock_extent_range(src, same_lock_start, same_lock_len,
> @@ -3165,7 +3127,7 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
> * Ranges in the io trees already unlocked. Now unlock all
> * pages before waiting for all IO to complete.
> */
> - btrfs_cmp_data_free(&cmp);
> + btrfs_cmp_data_free(cmp);
> if (same_inode) {
> btrfs_wait_ordered_range(src, same_lock_start,
> same_lock_len);
> @@ -3178,12 +3140,12 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
> ASSERT(ret == 0);
> if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
> /* ranges in the io trees already unlocked */
> - btrfs_cmp_data_free(&cmp);
> + btrfs_cmp_data_free(cmp);
> return ret;
> }
>
> /* pass original length for comparison so we stay within i_size */
> - ret = btrfs_cmp_data(olen, &cmp);
> + ret = btrfs_cmp_data(olen, cmp);
> if (ret == 0)
> ret = btrfs_clone(src, dst, loff, olen, len, dst_loff, 1);
>
> @@ -3193,8 +3155,79 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
> else
> btrfs_double_extent_unlock(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, len);
>
> - btrfs_cmp_data_free(&cmp);
> -out_unlock:
> + btrfs_cmp_data_free(cmp);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +#define BTRFS_MAX_DEDUPE_LEN SZ_16M
> +
> +static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
> + struct inode *dst, u64 dst_loff)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + int num_pages;
> + bool same_inode = (src == dst);
> + u64 i, tail_len, chunk_count;
> + struct cmp_pages cmp;
> +
> + if (olen == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* don't make the dst file partly checksummed */
> + if ((BTRFS_I(src)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM) !=
> + (BTRFS_I(dst)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM)) {
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (same_inode)
> + inode_lock(src);
> + else
> + btrfs_double_inode_lock(src, dst);
> +
> + tail_len = olen % BTRFS_MAX_DEDUPE_LEN;
> + chunk_count = div_u64(olen, BTRFS_MAX_DEDUPE_LEN);
> +
> + if (chunk_count > 0) {
> + num_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(BTRFS_MAX_DEDUPE_LEN) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + } else {
> + num_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(tail_len) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + }
> + /*
> + * We must gather up all the pages before we initiate our
> + * extent locking. We use an array for the page pointers. Size
> + * of the array is bounded by len, which is in turn bounded by
> + * BTRFS_MAX_DEDUPE_LEN.
> + */
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + cmp.src_pages = kcalloc(num_pages, sizeof(struct page *),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cmp.src_pages)
> + goto out;
> + cmp.dst_pages = kcalloc(num_pages, sizeof(struct page *),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cmp.dst_pages)
> + goto out;
> +
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < chunk_count; i++) {
> + ret = __btrfs_extent_same(src, loff, BTRFS_MAX_DEDUPE_LEN,
> + dst, dst_loff, &cmp);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + loff += BTRFS_MAX_DEDUPE_LEN;
> + dst_loff += BTRFS_MAX_DEDUPE_LEN;
> + }
> +
> + if (tail_len > 0)
> + ret = __btrfs_extent_same(src, loff, tail_len,
> + dst, dst_loff, &cmp);
> +
> +out:
> + kfree(cmp.src_pages);
> + kfree(cmp.dst_pages);
> +
> if (same_inode)
> inode_unlock(src);
> else
> @@ -3203,8 +3236,6 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -#define BTRFS_MAX_DEDUPE_LEN SZ_16M
> -
> ssize_t btrfs_dedupe_file_range(struct file *src_file, u64 loff, u64 olen,
> struct file *dst_file, u64 dst_loff)
> {
> @@ -3213,9 +3244,6 @@ ssize_t btrfs_dedupe_file_range(struct file *src_file, u64 loff, u64 olen,
> u64 bs = BTRFS_I(src)->root->fs_info->sb->s_blocksize;
> ssize_t res;
>
> - if (olen > BTRFS_MAX_DEDUPE_LEN)
> - olen = BTRFS_MAX_DEDUPE_LEN;
> -
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bs < PAGE_SIZE)) {
> /*
> * Btrfs does not support blocksize < page_size. As a
> --
> 2.15.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-19 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-19 10:02 [PATCH 0/4] Btrfs: just bunch of patches to ioctl.c Timofey Titovets
2017-12-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: btrfs_dedupe_file_range() ioctl, remove 16MiB restriction Timofey Titovets
2017-12-19 21:23 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-01-08 9:17 ` Timofey Titovets
2017-12-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] Btrfs: make should_defrag_range() understood compressed extents Timofey Titovets
2018-05-29 14:05 ` Timofey Titovets
2017-12-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] Btrfs: allow btrfs_defrag_file() uncompress files on defragmentation Timofey Titovets
2017-12-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] Btrfs: reduce size of struct btrfs_inode Timofey Titovets
2018-01-09 10:53 ` [PATCH 0/4] Btrfs: just bunch of patches to ioctl.c Timofey Titovets
2018-02-09 9:00 ` Timofey Titovets
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171219212333.GA11950@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nefelim4ag@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).