From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: fix scrub to repair raid6 corruption
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:36:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180102203642.14105-2-bo.li.liu@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180102203642.14105-1-bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
The raid6 corruption is that,
suppose that all disks can be read without problems and if the content
that was read out doesn't match its checksum, currently for raid6
btrfs at most retries twice,
- the 1st retry is to rebuild with all other stripes, it'll eventually
be a raid5 xor rebuild,
- if the 1st fails, the 2nd retry will deliberately fail parity p so
that it will do raid6 style rebuild,
however, the chances are that another non-parity stripe content also
has something corrupted, so that the above retries are not able to
return correct content.
We've fixed normal reads to rebuild raid6 correctly with more retries
in Patch "Btrfs: make raid6 rebuild retry more"[1], this is to fix
scrub to do the exactly same rebuild process.
[1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10091755/
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index 951e881..1bc3ee4 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -301,6 +301,11 @@ static void __scrub_blocked_if_needed(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
static void scrub_blocked_if_needed(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
static void scrub_put_ctx(struct scrub_ctx *sctx);
+static inline int scrub_is_page_on_raid56(struct scrub_page *page)
+{
+ return page->recover &&
+ (page->recover->bbio->map_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK);
+}
static void scrub_pending_bio_inc(struct scrub_ctx *sctx)
{
@@ -1323,15 +1328,34 @@ static int scrub_handle_errored_block(struct scrub_block *sblock_to_check)
* could happen otherwise that a correct page would be
* overwritten by a bad one).
*/
- for (mirror_index = 0;
- mirror_index < BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS &&
- sblocks_for_recheck[mirror_index].page_count > 0;
- mirror_index++) {
+ for (mirror_index = 0; ;mirror_index++) {
struct scrub_block *sblock_other;
if (mirror_index == failed_mirror_index)
continue;
- sblock_other = sblocks_for_recheck + mirror_index;
+
+ /* raid56's mirror can be more than BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS */
+ if (!scrub_is_page_on_raid56(sblock_bad->pagev[0])) {
+ if (mirror_index >= BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS)
+ break;
+ if (!sblocks_for_recheck[mirror_index].page_count)
+ break;
+
+ sblock_other = sblocks_for_recheck + mirror_index;
+ } else {
+ struct scrub_recover *r = sblock_bad->pagev[0]->recover;
+ int max_allowed = r->bbio->num_stripes -
+ r->bbio->num_tgtdevs;
+
+ if (mirror_index >= max_allowed)
+ break;
+ if (!sblocks_for_recheck[1].page_count)
+ break;
+
+ ASSERT(failed_mirror_index == 0);
+ sblock_other = sblocks_for_recheck + 1;
+ sblock_other->pagev[0]->mirror_num = 1 + mirror_index;
+ }
/* build and submit the bios, check checksums */
scrub_recheck_block(fs_info, sblock_other, 0);
@@ -1671,26 +1695,22 @@ static void scrub_bio_wait_endio(struct bio *bio)
complete(bio->bi_private);
}
-static inline int scrub_is_page_on_raid56(struct scrub_page *page)
-{
- return page->recover &&
- (page->recover->bbio->map_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK);
-}
-
static int scrub_submit_raid56_bio_wait(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct bio *bio,
struct scrub_page *page)
{
DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done);
int ret;
+ int mirror_num;
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = page->logical >> 9;
bio->bi_private = &done;
bio->bi_end_io = scrub_bio_wait_endio;
+ mirror_num = page->sblock->pagev[0]->mirror_num;
ret = raid56_parity_recover(fs_info, bio, page->recover->bbio,
page->recover->map_length,
- page->mirror_num, 0);
+ mirror_num, 0);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.9.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-02 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-02 20:36 [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] Btrfs: make raid6 rebuild retry more Liu Bo
2018-01-02 20:36 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2018-01-05 12:51 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180102203642.14105-2-bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).