linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: make code easy to read in btrfs_open_one_device()
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:09:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180105140915.GL3553@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171215074016.26461-1-anand.jain@oracle.com>

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 03:40:14PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> No functional change. First set the usual case, writeable then check
> for any special config.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 8 +++-----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 5a4c30451c7f..a81574dba124 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -676,14 +676,12 @@ static int btrfs_open_one_device(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
>  
>  	device->generation = btrfs_super_generation(disk_super);
>  
> +	set_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);

I would not say there's no functional change. This line will
unconditionally set the writeable flag, but this was not the case
before.

Sure it's dropped a few lines below, but this would need some checking
that it's not a problem. btrfs_open_one_device is indirectly called from
mount so it should be safe (we can't use one device twice), but this
needs to be documented.

>  	if (btrfs_super_flags(disk_super) & BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_SEEDING) {
>  		clear_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);
>  		fs_devices->seeding = 1;
> -	} else {
> -		if (bdev_read_only(bdev))
> -			clear_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);
> -		else
> -			set_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);
> +	} else if (bdev_read_only(bdev)) {
> +		clear_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);
>  	}
>  
>  	q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> -- 
> 2.7.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-05 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-15  7:40 [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: make code easy to read in btrfs_open_one_device() Anand Jain
2017-12-15  7:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: optimize move uuid_mutex closer to the critical section Anand Jain
2018-01-05 14:11   ` David Sterba
2017-12-15  7:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: misc cleanup btrfs_scan_one_device() Anand Jain
2018-01-05 14:14   ` David Sterba
2018-01-05 14:09 ` David Sterba [this message]
2018-01-22  4:11   ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: make code easy to read in btrfs_open_one_device() Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180105140915.GL3553@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).