From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: make code easy to read in btrfs_open_one_device()
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:09:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180105140915.GL3553@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171215074016.26461-1-anand.jain@oracle.com>
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 03:40:14PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> No functional change. First set the usual case, writeable then check
> for any special config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 5a4c30451c7f..a81574dba124 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -676,14 +676,12 @@ static int btrfs_open_one_device(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
>
> device->generation = btrfs_super_generation(disk_super);
>
> + set_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);
I would not say there's no functional change. This line will
unconditionally set the writeable flag, but this was not the case
before.
Sure it's dropped a few lines below, but this would need some checking
that it's not a problem. btrfs_open_one_device is indirectly called from
mount so it should be safe (we can't use one device twice), but this
needs to be documented.
> if (btrfs_super_flags(disk_super) & BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_SEEDING) {
> clear_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);
> fs_devices->seeding = 1;
> - } else {
> - if (bdev_read_only(bdev))
> - clear_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);
> - else
> - set_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);
> + } else if (bdev_read_only(bdev)) {
> + clear_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);
> }
>
> q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> --
> 2.7.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-05 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-15 7:40 [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: make code easy to read in btrfs_open_one_device() Anand Jain
2017-12-15 7:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: optimize move uuid_mutex closer to the critical section Anand Jain
2018-01-05 14:11 ` David Sterba
2017-12-15 7:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: misc cleanup btrfs_scan_one_device() Anand Jain
2018-01-05 14:14 ` David Sterba
2018-01-05 14:09 ` David Sterba [this message]
2018-01-22 4:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: make code easy to read in btrfs_open_one_device() Anand Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180105140915.GL3553@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).