From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: common/rc: fix device still mounted error with SCRATCH_DEV_POOL
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:22:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180115062228.GA3102@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180113010459.24321-1-bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:04:59PM -0700, Liu Bo wrote:
> One of btrfs tests, btrfs/011, uses SCRATCH_DEV_POOL and puts a non-SCRATCH_DEV
> device as the first one when doing mkfs, and this makes
> _require_scratch{_nocheck} fail to umount $SCRATCH_MNT since it checks mount
> point with SCRATCH_DEV only, and for sure it finds nothing to umount and the
> following tests complain about 'device still mounted' alike errors.
>
> Introduce a helper to address this special case where both btrfs and scratch
> dev pool are in use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Hmm, I didn't see this problem, I ran btrfs/011 then another tests that
uses $SCRATCH_DEV, and the second test ran fine too. Can you please
provide more details?
Anyway, I think we should fix btrfs/011 to either not use $SCRATCH_DEV
in replace operations (AFAIK, other btrfs replace tests do this) or
umount all devices before exit. And I noticed btrfs/011 does umount
$SCRATCH_MNT at the end of workout(), so usually all should be fine
(perhaps it would leave a device mounted if interrupted in the middle of
test run, because _cleanup() doesn't do umount).
Thanks,
Eryu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-15 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-13 1:04 [PATCH] fstests: common/rc: fix device still mounted error with SCRATCH_DEV_POOL Liu Bo
2018-01-15 6:22 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2018-01-15 17:20 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180115062228.GA3102@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).