From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Btrfs: expose bad chunks in sysfs
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:23:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180212152305.GC25827@dhcp-10-159-140-209.vpn.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180209045739.GA5420@magnolia>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 08:57:39PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 04:15:02PM -0700, Liu Bo wrote:
> > Btrfs tries its best to tolerate write errors, but kind of silently
> > (except some messages in kernel log).
> >
> > For raid1 and raid10, this is usually not a problem because there is a
> > copy as backup, while for parity based raid setup, i.e. raid5 and
> > raid6, the problem is that, if a write error occurs due to some bad
> > sectors, one horizonal stripe becomes degraded and the number of write
> > errors it can tolerate gets reduced by one, now if two disk fails,
> > data may be lost forever.
> >
> > One way to mitigate the data loss pain is to expose 'bad chunks',
> > i.e. degraded chunks, to users, so that they can use 'btrfs balance'
> > to relocate the whole chunk and get the full raid6 protection again
> > (if the relocation works).
> >
> > This introduces 'bad_chunks' in btrfs's per-fs sysfs directory. Once
> > a chunk of raid5 or raid6 becomes degraded, it will appear in
> > 'bad_chunks'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > - In this patch, 'bad chunks' is not persistent on disk, but it can be
> > added if it's thought to be a good idea.
> > - This is lightly tested, comments are very welcome.
>
> Hmmm... sorry to be late to the party and dump a bunch of semirelated
> work suggestions, but what if you implemented GETFSMAP for btrfs? Then
> you could define a new 'defective' fsmap type/flag/whatever and export
> it for whatever metadata/filedata/whatever is now screwed up? Existing
> interface, you don't have to kludge sysfs data, none of this string
> interpretation stuff...
By checking FSGETMAP semantics, I think I can give it a shot.
Right now we have dev stat ioctl, it's per device based and not
suitable for exposing per-fs stuff, so a GETFSMAP could probably
provide what I want.
Thanks for the suggestion, Darrick.
Thanks,
-liubo
>
> --D
>
> >
> > fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 8 +++++++
> > fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 2 ++
> > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 13 +++++++++++
> > fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 15 +++++++++++--
> > fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 2 ++
> > 7 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> > index 13c260b..08aad65 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> > @@ -1101,6 +1101,9 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
> > spinlock_t ref_verify_lock;
> > struct rb_root block_tree;
> > #endif
> > +
> > + struct list_head bad_chunks;
> > + seqlock_t bc_lock;
> > };
> >
> > static inline struct btrfs_fs_info *btrfs_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> > @@ -2568,6 +2571,11 @@ static inline gfp_t btrfs_alloc_write_mask(struct address_space *mapping)
> >
> > /* extent-tree.c */
> >
> > +struct btrfs_bad_chunk {
> > + u64 chunk_offset;
> > + struct list_head list;
> > +};
> > +
> > enum btrfs_inline_ref_type {
> > BTRFS_REF_TYPE_INVALID = 0,
> > BTRFS_REF_TYPE_BLOCK = 1,
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> > index a8ecccf..061e7f94 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> > @@ -2568,6 +2568,8 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
> > init_waitqueue_head(&fs_info->async_submit_wait);
> >
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs_info->pinned_chunks);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs_info->bad_chunks);
> > + seqlock_init(&fs_info->bc_lock);
> >
> > /* Usable values until the real ones are cached from the superblock */
> > fs_info->nodesize = 4096;
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> > index 2f43285..3ca7cb4 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> > @@ -9903,6 +9903,19 @@ int btrfs_free_block_groups(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
> > kobject_del(&space_info->kobj);
> > kobject_put(&space_info->kobj);
> > }
> > +
> > + /* Clean up bad chunks. */
> > + write_seqlock_irq(&info->bc_lock);
> > + while (!list_empty(&info->bad_chunks)) {
> > + struct btrfs_bad_chunk *bc;
> > +
> > + bc = list_first_entry(&info->bad_chunks,
> > + struct btrfs_bad_chunk, list);
> > + list_del_init(&bc->list);
> > + kfree(bc);
> > + }
> > + write_sequnlock_irq(&info->bc_lock);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
> > index a7f7925..e960247 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
> > @@ -888,14 +888,19 @@ static void rbio_orig_end_io(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio, blk_status_t err)
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > - * end io function used by finish_rmw. When we finally
> > - * get here, we've written a full stripe
> > + * end io function used by finish_rmw. When we finally get here, we've written
> > + * a full stripe.
> > + *
> > + * Note that this is not under interrupt context as we queued endio to workers.
> > */
> > static void raid_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
> > {
> > struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio = bio->bi_private;
> > blk_status_t err = bio->bi_status;
> > int max_errors;
> > + u64 stripe_start = rbio->bbio->raid_map[0];
> > + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = rbio->fs_info;
> > + int err_cnt;
> >
> > if (err)
> > fail_bio_stripe(rbio, bio);
> > @@ -908,12 +913,58 @@ static void raid_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
> > err = BLK_STS_OK;
> >
> > /* OK, we have read all the stripes we need to. */
> > + err_cnt = atomic_read(&rbio->error);
> > max_errors = (rbio->operation == BTRFS_RBIO_PARITY_SCRUB) ?
> > 0 : rbio->bbio->max_errors;
> > if (atomic_read(&rbio->error) > max_errors)
> > err = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> >
> > rbio_orig_end_io(rbio, err);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If there is any error, this stripe is a degraded one, so is the whole
> > + * chunk, expose this chunk info to sysfs.
> > + */
> > + if (unlikely(err_cnt)) {
> > + struct btrfs_bad_chunk *bc;
> > + struct btrfs_bad_chunk *tmp;
> > + struct extent_map *em;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + em = get_chunk_map(fs_info, stripe_start, 1);
> > + if (IS_ERR(em))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + bc = kzalloc(sizeof(*bc), GFP_NOFS);
> > + /* If allocation fails, it's OK. */
> > + if (!bc) {
> > + free_extent_map(em);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + write_seqlock_irqsave(&fs_info->bc_lock, flags);
> > + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &fs_info->bad_chunks, list) {
> > + if (tmp->chunk_offset != em->start)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Don't bother if this chunk has already been recorded.
> > + */
> > + write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&fs_info->bc_lock, flags);
> > + kfree(bc);
> > + free_extent_map(em);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Add new bad chunk to list. */
> > + bc->chunk_offset = em->start;
> > + free_extent_map(em);
> > +
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bc->list);
> > + list_add(&bc->list, &fs_info->bad_chunks);
> > +
> > + write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&fs_info->bc_lock, flags);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -1320,6 +1371,8 @@ static noinline void finish_rmw(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
> > bio->bi_end_io = raid_write_end_io;
> > bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, 0);
> >
> > + btrfs_bio_wq_end_io(rbio->fs_info, bio, BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_RAID56);
> > +
> > submit_bio(bio);
> > }
> > return;
> > @@ -2465,6 +2518,8 @@ static noinline void finish_parity_scrub(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio,
> > bio->bi_end_io = raid_write_end_io;
> > bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, 0);
> >
> > + btrfs_bio_wq_end_io(rbio->fs_info, bio, BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_RAID56);
> > +
> > submit_bio(bio);
> > }
> > return;
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c b/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
> > index a28bba8..0baaa33 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
> > @@ -490,12 +490,38 @@ static ssize_t quota_override_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> >
> > BTRFS_ATTR_RW(, quota_override, quota_override_show, quota_override_store);
> >
> > +static ssize_t btrfs_bad_chunks_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> > + struct kobj_attribute *a, char *buf)
> > +{
> > + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = to_fs_info(kobj);
> > + struct btrfs_bad_chunk *bc;
> > + int len = 0;
> > + unsigned int seq;
> > +
> > + /* read lock please */
> > + do {
> > + seq = read_seqbegin(&fs_info->bc_lock);
> > + list_for_each_entry(bc, &fs_info->bad_chunks, list) {
> > + len += snprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%llu\n",
> > + bc->chunk_offset);
> > + /* chunk offset is u64 */
> > + if (len >= PAGE_SIZE)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + } while (read_seqretry(&fs_info->bc_lock, seq));
> > +
> > + return len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +BTRFS_ATTR(, bad_chunks, btrfs_bad_chunks_show);
> > +
> > static const struct attribute *btrfs_attrs[] = {
> > BTRFS_ATTR_PTR(, label),
> > BTRFS_ATTR_PTR(, nodesize),
> > BTRFS_ATTR_PTR(, sectorsize),
> > BTRFS_ATTR_PTR(, clone_alignment),
> > BTRFS_ATTR_PTR(, quota_override),
> > + BTRFS_ATTR_PTR(, bad_chunks),
> > NULL,
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > index a256842..d71f11a 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > @@ -2803,8 +2803,8 @@ static int btrfs_del_sys_chunk(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 chunk_offset)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static struct extent_map *get_chunk_map(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> > - u64 logical, u64 length)
> > +struct extent_map *get_chunk_map(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> > + u64 logical, u64 length)
> > {
> > struct extent_map_tree *em_tree;
> > struct extent_map *em;
> > @@ -2840,6 +2840,7 @@ int btrfs_remove_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> > u64 dev_extent_len = 0;
> > int i, ret = 0;
> > struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = fs_info->fs_devices;
> > + struct btrfs_bad_chunk *bc;
> >
> > em = get_chunk_map(fs_info, chunk_offset, 1);
> > if (IS_ERR(em)) {
> > @@ -2916,6 +2917,16 @@ int btrfs_remove_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> > }
> >
> > out:
> > + write_seqlock_irq(&fs_info->bc_lock);
> > + list_for_each_entry(bc, &fs_info->bad_chunks, list) {
> > + if (bc->chunk_offset == chunk_offset) {
> > + list_del_init(&bc->list);
> > + kfree(bc);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + write_sequnlock_irq(&fs_info->bc_lock);
> > +
> > /* once for us */
> > free_extent_map(em);
> > return ret;
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > index ff15208..4e846ba 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > @@ -396,6 +396,8 @@ static inline enum btrfs_map_op btrfs_op(struct bio *bio)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +struct extent_map *get_chunk_map(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> > + u64 logical, u64 length);
> > int btrfs_account_dev_extents_size(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 start,
> > u64 end, u64 *length);
> > void btrfs_get_bbio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio);
> > --
> > 2.9.4
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-12 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-05 23:15 [PATCH RFC] Btrfs: expose bad chunks in sysfs Liu Bo
2018-02-06 1:28 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-02-07 22:57 ` Liu Bo
2018-02-08 2:49 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-02-06 9:11 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-02-12 14:17 ` Liu Bo
2018-02-12 17:39 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-02-13 0:06 ` Liu Bo
2018-02-08 9:47 ` Anand Jain
2018-02-12 14:37 ` Liu Bo
2018-02-08 18:52 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2018-02-08 19:07 ` Liu Bo
2018-02-09 0:23 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-02-09 17:02 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2018-02-12 15:26 ` Liu Bo
2018-02-09 4:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-02-12 15:23 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2018-02-26 17:18 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180212152305.GC25827@dhcp-10-159-140-209.vpn.oracle.com \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).