From: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
To: "Ellis H. Wilson III" <ellisw@panasas.com>
Cc: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Metadata / Data on Heterogeneous Media
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:11:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180215191155.GP3807@carfax.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b2df382-0402-a806-9ebf-996fabf22ba4@panasas.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1864 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:15:49PM -0500, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
> In discussing the performance of various metadata operations over
> the past few days I've had this idea in the back of my head, and
> wanted to see if anybody had already thought about it before
> (likely, I would guess).
>
> It appears based on this page:
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_design
> that data and metadata in BTRFS are fairly well isolated from one
> another, particularly in the case of large files. This appears
> reinforced by a recent comment from Qu ("...btrfs strictly
> split metadata and data usage...").
>
> Yet, while there are plenty of options to RAID0/1/10/etc across
> generally homogeneous media types, there doesn't appear to be any
> functionality (at least that I can find) to segment different BTRFS
> internals to different types of devices. E.G., place metadata trees
> and extent block groups on SSD, and data trees and extent block
> groups on HDD(s).
>
> Is this something that has already been considered (and if so,
> implemented, which would make me extremely happy)? Is it feasible
> it is hasn't been approached yet? I admit my internal knowledge of
> BTRFS is fleeting, though I'm trying to work on that daily at this
> time, so forgive me if this is unapproachable for obvious
> architectural reasons.
Well, it's been discussed, and I wrote up a theoretical framework
which should cover a wide range of use-cases:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg33916.html
I never got round to implementing it, though -- I ran into issues
over storing the properties/metadata needed to configure it.
Hugo.
--
Hugo Mills | Dullest spy film ever: The Eastbourne Ultimatum
hugo@... carfax.org.uk |
http://carfax.org.uk/ |
PGP: E2AB1DE4 | The Thick of It
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-15 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-15 17:15 Metadata / Data on Heterogeneous Media Ellis H. Wilson III
2018-02-15 19:06 ` Adam Borowski
2018-02-15 20:30 ` Ellis H. Wilson III
2018-02-15 19:11 ` Hugo Mills [this message]
2018-02-15 20:31 ` Ellis H. Wilson III
2018-02-16 3:57 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180215191155.GP3807@carfax.org.uk \
--to=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=ellisw@panasas.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).