From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f68.google.com ([209.85.160.68]:43025 "EHLO mail-pl0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932076AbeBUSuf (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:50:35 -0500 Received: by mail-pl0-f68.google.com with SMTP id f23so1413712plr.10 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:50:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:50:32 -0800 From: Omar Sandoval To: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/27] btrfs-progs: introduce libbtrfsutil, "btrfs-progs as a library" Message-ID: <20180221185032.GA879@vader> References: <20180220185048.GR10193@twin.jikos.cz> <20180221151338.GF1469@twin.jikos.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20180221151338.GF1469@twin.jikos.cz> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:13:38PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:50:48PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > I have more comments or maybe questions about the future development > > workflow, but at this point the patchset is in a good shape for > > incremental merge. > > After removnig the first patch adding subvolume.c (with > linux/btrfs_tree.h) and what depends on it, I'm left with: > > Omar Sandoval (4): > Add libbtrfsutil > libbtrfsutil: add Python bindings > libbtrfsutil: add qgroup inheritance helpers > libbtrfsutil: add filesystem sync helpers > > with some context updates. That builds and passes the CI tests. Great. Does the CI system run the Python tests yet?