From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Inconsistence between sender and receiver
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 22:38:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180309053808.GD26754@dhcp-10-211-47-181.usdhcp.oraclecorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a7f0c8f-9bf1-b6eb-ff5c-517d935b84e8@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:15:50AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 07.03.2018 21:49, Liu Bo пишет:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the following steps[1], if <parent> on receiver side has got
> > changed via 'btrfs property set', then after doing incremental
> > updates, receiver gets a different snapshot from what sender has sent.
> >
> > The reason behind it is that there is no change about file 'foo' in
> > the send stream, such that receiver simply creates a snapshot of
> > <parent> on its side with nothing to apply from the send stream.
> >
> > A possible way to avoid this is to check rtransid and ctranid of
> > <parent> on receiver side, but I'm not very sure whether the current
> > behavior is made deliberately, does anyone have an idea?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -liubo
> >
> > [1]:
> > $ btrfs sub create /mnt/send/sub
> > $ touch /mnt/send/sub/foo
> > $ btrfs sub snap -r /mnt/send/sub /mnt/send/parent
> >
> > # send parent out
> > $ btrfs send /mnt/send/parent | btrfs receive /mnt/recv/
> >
> > # change parent and file under it
> > $ btrfs property set -t subvol /mnt/recv/parent ro false
>
> Is removing the ability to modify read-only property an option? What are
> use cases for it? What can it do that "btrfs sub snap read-only
> writable" cannot?
>
Tbh, I don't know any usecase for that, I just wanted to toggle off
the ro bit in order to change something inside <parent>.
> > $ truncate -s 4096 /mnt/recv/parent/foo
> >
> > $ btrfs sub snap -r /mnt/send/sub /mnt/send/update
> > $ btrfs send -p /mnt/send/parent /mnt/send/update | btrfs receive /mnt/recv
> >
>
> This should fail right away because /mnt/send/parent is not read-only.
> If it does not, this is really a bug.
>
It's not '/mnt/send/parent', but '/mnt/recv/parent' got changed.
Thanks,
-liubo
> Of course one may go one step further and set /mnt/send/parent read-only
> again, then we get this issue.
>
> > $ ls -l /mnt/send/update
> > total 0
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Mar 6 11:13 foo
> >
> > $ ls -l /mnt/recv/update
> > total 0
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Mar 6 11:14 foo
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-09 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-07 18:49 Inconsistence between sender and receiver Liu Bo
2018-03-08 6:15 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2018-03-09 5:38 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2018-03-09 6:45 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2018-03-09 18:09 ` David Sterba
2018-03-08 15:29 ` Filipe Manana
2018-03-09 5:39 ` Liu Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180309053808.GD26754@dhcp-10-211-47-181.usdhcp.oraclecorp.com \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=arvidjaar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).