From: Edmund Nadolski <enadolski@suse.com>
To: enadolski@suse.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] missing initialization in btrfs_check_shared
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 09:03:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180314150311.20152-1-enadolski@suse.com> (raw)
This patch addresses an issue that causes fiemap to falsely
report a shared extent. The test case is as follows:
# cat do_xfs_io
xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite -b 16k 0 64k" -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5
sync
xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5
which gives the resulting output:
# . do_xfs_io
wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (121.359 MiB/sec and 7766.9903 ops/sec)
/media/scratch/file5:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x2001
/media/scratch/file5:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x1
This is because btrfs_check_shared calls find_parent_nodes
repeatedly in a loop, passing a share_check struct to report
the count of shared extent. But btrfs_check_shared does not
re-initialize the count value to zero for subsequent calls
from the loop, resulting in a false share count value. This
is a regressive behavior from 4.13.
With proper re-initialization the test result is as follows:
# . do_xfs_io
wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (110.035 MiB/sec and 7042.2535 ops/sec)
/media/scratch/file5:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x1
/media/scratch/file5:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x1
which corrects the regression.
Edmund Nadolski (1):
btrfs: add missing initialization in btrfs_check_shared
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--
2.10.2
next reply other threads:[~2018-03-14 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-14 15:03 Edmund Nadolski [this message]
2018-03-14 15:03 ` [PATCH] btrfs: add missing initialization in btrfs_check_shared Edmund Nadolski
2018-03-14 15:09 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-03-14 15:24 ` David Sterba
2018-03-14 15:08 ` [PATCH] " Filipe Manana
2018-03-16 18:20 ` Liu Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180314150311.20152-1-enadolski@suse.com \
--to=enadolski@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).